Slide background

    "Noted for the excellence of its white-collar defence practice"

    Chambers & Partners, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "Outstanding financial crime defence practice"

    Chambers & Partners, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "It’s a deluxe firm which pulls out all the stops for its clients"

    Chambers & Partners, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "They are the market leaders for serious crime’"

    Chambers & Partners, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "Kangs has an excellent reputation. They care about their clients and go the extra mile for them"

    Chambers & Partners, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "Kangs Solicitors is a standout firm"

    Legal 500, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "Kangs Solicitors is in the highest tier of firms"

    Legal 500, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "Hamraj Kang is noted for his very sharp legal brain"

    Legal 500, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "Kangs Solicitors fields a team of ‘technically able solicitors’
    and is well regarded for its serious crime and fraud work"

    Legal 500, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "Hamraj Kang is a shrewd tactician and very experienced"

    Legal 500, 2013 edition

    Slide background

    "What the team is known for - handles an extensive array of criminal matters
    including murder, drugs and white-collar crime"

    Chambers & Partners 2013 edition

    Slide background

    "Adept at dealing with cases that have an international dimension"

    Chambers & Partners 2013 edition

    Legal Actions brought by Insolvency Practitioners

    Criminal Defence Solicitors | Vat & Tax SolicitorsServicesLegal Actions brought by Insolvency Practitioners

    legal-actions

    Legal Actions brought by Insolvency Practitioners

    Insolvency Practitioners (IPs) now have more ability than ever to launch legal actions against Directors and Shareholders of failed, insolvent companies, often using insurance backed products, that give the IP the comfort of knowing that even if there is no money in the insolvent company, he can still launch a legal action against a Director or Shareholder, safe in the knowledge that even if the IP loses in the legal proceedings, the insurance product will pay any legal costs that might be ordered by the Court to be paid by him to his opponent Director / Shareholder. That is a powerful weapon for the IP.

    In the context of corporate failures, actions will most commonly be brought against Directors and Shareholders (to include De Facto and Shadow Directors) alleging, for example:

    • that Shareholders received an illegal or improper dividend in the period before the company went into formal Insolvency and who seek repayment of it;
    • that the Director(s) traded the company on for too long (i.e. beyond that point when they knew or ought to have known of its inevitable failure) and thus wrongfully or fraudulently traded the business of the company;
    • that the Directors made payments to themselves or their Associates which preferred their position over that of other creditors;
    • that the Directors sold or otherwise dealt with the company’s assets, in the lead up to liquidation/administration, at an undervalue or as a transaction to defraud creditors;
    • that the Directors’ conduct in some other way was improper so as to attract a claim for misfeasance;

    Impact of such proceedings by IPs

    Apart from the time and worry caused by those proceedings, there is the obvious threat to the Director’s personal asset base, most commonly his interest in his matrimonial home, if the Liquidator’s action were to succeed.

    Any litigation can be expensive, in terms of time and money, to defend or prosecute.

    IPs, before bringing such actions, will inevitably do their homework and investigate the likely extent of the personal asset base of the target Director or Shareholder.

    How should the Director or Shareholder react to such threats?

    • The Director should respond as soon as possible, in writing. Such proceedings by the IP will usually be preceded by a letter threatening proceedings from the IP’s solicitors. It needs to be responded to, in writing, as fully as possible and where appropriate, needs to be followed up by a meeting with the IP and his solicitor. The letter to the IP should aim to identify areas of weaknesses in the Liquidator’s identified case, most commonly by reliance on a combination of matters of fact and law, supported where possible by Company and other relevant documents.
    • If the IP is pursuing (or proposing to pursue) the litigation with insurance backed funding, then he will be duty bound to bring to the attention of the insurer any representations made by the Director which might cause the IP / insurer to think again about the likely success of such proceedings and, therefore, whether they should, in fact, be pursued.

    Security for costs

    If the IP threatens to bring proceedings in the name of the company then the Director needs to be sure that, if the IP loses, he will be in a position to pay the legal costs of the Director / Shareholder if ordered to do so by the Court. A request that the office holder (who will bring the proceedings on behalf of the company) pay a sum for costs into Court by way of security is, therefore, often appropriate.

    The Court will usually only order security to be paid for costs by an IP if the Director can (for example) show that he has an arguable defence to the IP’s case. The letter to the IP, referred to above, will therefore serve the purpose of setting out the grounds of that opposition at the earliest stage.

    What if the Director / Shareholder has no real defence to some or all of the Liquidator’s claim?

    It is often the case that the director/shareholder has no defence to some or all of the claim. The well advised Director/Shareholder will, where appropriate, explain to the Liquidator/his solicitors, that he has other creditors so that even if the IP succeeds in his action, then there may be insufficient funds to pay the IP’s claim in any event. Many a threatened action by an IP is settled once the IP has been told that the Director’s available capital and assets, that might otherwise satisfy any judgment that could be obtained, will instead be used to fund the legal defence of the claim against him.

    Contact:
    Mr Hamraj Kang
    hkang@kangssolicitors.co.uk
    07976 258 171 / 020 7936 6396 / 0121 449 9888

    Print this page