01/10/14
Kangs successfully argue Self-Defence
Share
Kangs represented one of two Defendants charged with savagely assaulting a member of the public where the victim was left with a fractured jaw
Following a three day trial, the jury accepted that the Defendant was acting in self-defence, despite a number of Prosecution witnesses stating that our client was the aggressor.
Steven Micklewright who represented the Defendant commented
"This was an excellent result, not least because of the strong Prosecution witness evidence against the defendant".
The client commended Steven for his meticulous analysis of the prosecution evidence that helped secure the acquittal.
Commercial Disputes, Criminal Litigation
In court proceedings, whether they be in a criminal or a civil court, the evidence produced, by the Prosecution in a criminal court, or the Claimant in a civil court, has to be of the quality to satisfy ‘the standard of proof,’ for the case to succeed. The burden of proof describes the responsibility of […]
11/05/26
Criminal Litigation
Sellers of bladed products are subject to strict delivery conditions to prevent them from being delivered to a person under eighteen, and failing to comply with these requirements can result in serious consequences. Police recorded crime data for the year ending December 2024 showed that offences involving knives or sharp instruments increased by 2% over […]
08/05/26
Criminal Litigation, Financial Investigations
We have previously published articles outlining the benefits of pre‑charge engagement during police investigations before a charging decision is made. We have also highlighted the importance of having a solicitor present during police interviews, and how their guidance can help prevent individuals from unintentionally making incriminating statements that could later be used against them. In […]
20/04/26
