Serious Fraud Office |Section 2 Interviews | Fraud Solicitors


What is a Section 2 Interview?| Solicitors dealing with Serious Fraud Office (‘SFO’) cases

Section 2 of the Criminal Justice Act 1987 gives powers to the SFO to serve a Notice in writing requiring a person whose affairs are to be investigated or, any other person whom it is believed has relevant information, to answer questions or furnish information with respect to any matter relevant to the investigation.

Therefore, anyone who is served with a Section 2 Notice is required to attend an interview.

The interview is not conducted under caution but the interviewee is required to answer all questions on any matters relevant to the investigation fully and accurately.

Should the interviewee fail to do so without a reasonable excuse or makes a statement recklessly or deliberately known to be false or misleading, they may be committing a criminal offence.

However, safeguards have been put in place which state that answers given under compulsion during the interview may not be used in evidence against you, unless:

  1. You are prosecuted for making a statement that is false or misleading; or
  2. You are prosecuted for some other offence and, when giving evidence, you make a statement which is inconsistent with a statement made during the interview.

The new SFO guidance for Section 2 Interviews | Criminal Fraud Solicitors

In June 2016 the SFO published new guidance in relation to Section 2 interviews.

The main effect of the guidance dictates when lawyers can be present to assist clients during Section 2 interviews.

Since June, lawyers will only be permitted to attend Section 2 interviews if the SFO case controller believes that such attendance will assist the purpose of the interview and / or investigation, or provide essential assistance to the interviewee by way of ‘legal advice or pastoral support’.

Should a lawyer request to attend an interview for their client, a Notice has to be served upon the SFO within strict time limits setting out reasons why their presence is required, acknowledging the parameters of the role of the lawyer and providing undertakings binding the lawyer’s firm.

Importantly, the firm must state that they do not represent any corporate or individual who is a suspect in the investigation.

Should the SFO feel that the parameters of the lawyer’s role are not being observed, the lawyer can be excluded from the interview without notice.

Should permission be granted, only one lawyer will be allowed to be present.

Therefore, there is no longer a presumption that a legal representative can be present; instead, a burden has been placed upon the interviewee and the lawyer to justify the lawyer’s attendance.

Even if such justification is provided, it is still in the discretion of the SFO as to whether or not to allow the lawyer to take part in the interview process.

How it may apply to you | Need help with a SFO case

If you are a body corporate being investigated and the SFO serve a Section 2 notice on one or more of your employees, case law is now established that company lawyers can no longer also represent your employees.

Therefore, employees will need to find separate representation.

If you are an individual who has been served with a Section 2 notice you will be best advised to have legal representation to protect your interests.

How can we help | Advice available | Solicitors defending SFO prosecutions

Kangs Solicitors have extensive experience in dealing with SFO investigations. Our skilled team is led by Hamraj Kang who has over 20 years’ experience in defending serious fraud cases.

Should you receive a Section 2 notice, you should seek legal advice immediately in order that the strict time frames under the new guidance can be complied with.

Our experienced team of fraud practitioners will be pleased to advise you and can be contacted using the below details.

Hamraj Kang
07976 258 171 / 020 7936 6396 / 0121 449 9888

John Veale
0121 449 9888 / 020 7936 6396 / 07989 521 210
(24hr Emergency Number)

News insights, Serious Fraud, Services
A former Labour MP, Jared O’Mara, has received an immediate custodial sentence of four years having been found guilty, following his trial, of six counts of fraud relating to false expenses claims for work that he never carried out in respect of jobs that did not even exist. For further Press details please follow the […]
Criminal Litigation, News insights, Services
Kangs Solicitors has recently successfully defended a client facing an allegation of assault occasioning actual bodily harm arising from an incident forced upon him whilst he was simply conducting his  business, running a restaurant in London’s West End, when confronted with an unsavoury situation. Kangs Solicitors was instructed from the onset attending the interview under caution at Charing […]
Insolvency, News insights, Services
Kangs Solicitors has been instructed to defend claims against our client alleging breaches of Section 212 and 213 of the Insolvency Act 1986. The claims are being brought by the joint liquidators of our client’s company on the basis that our client allegedly knew that he and his company were participating in ‘Missing Trader Intra- Community’ Fraud’ […]

Get in touch