Legal Professional Privilege | Kangs Criminal Defence Solicitors


The Court of Appeal has recently handed down an important Judgement protecting legal professional privilege (‘LPP’).

Helen Holder of Kangs Solicitors explains the nature of LPP.

What is Legal Professional Privilege? | Kangs Criminal Law Advisory Team

LPP protects all communications between professional legal advisors and their clients from being disclosed without each individual client’s permission.

In 1996 Lord Taylor of Gosforth QC outlined the importance of LPP when he stated:

“a man must be able to consult his lawyer in confidence, since otherwise he might hold back half the truth. The client must be sure that what he tells his lawyer in confidence will never be revealed without his consent. Legal professional privilege is thus much more than an ordinary rule of evidence, limited in its application to the facts of a particular case. It is a fundamental condition on which the administration of justice as a whole rests.”

Documents or communication between a client and professional legal advisor are not privileged where the purpose of the client is the furtherance of crime, fraud or other iniquity. 

The Recent Court of Appeal Case | Kangs Case Law Reporting Team

The circumstances

  • The Appeal Court considered the matter of Addlesee & others v Dentons Europe LLP in which investors in a scheme marketed by a Cypriot company (Anabus) were seeking disclosure of documents from their solicitors at the time, Salans LLP, which firm has subsequently been renamed Dentons Europe LLP (‘Dentons’). 
  • The investors claimed that the scheme was fraudulent and had issued proceedings against Dentons claiming deceit and/or negligence.  To enable them to pursue the claim they wished to see documents passing between Salans LLP and Anabus, which had been  dissolved in Cyprus in 2016. 
  • The Court of Appeal was asked to consider whether privilege was waived when the client which had received the legal services no longer existed. 

The competing arguments

  • The investors argued that as the client was no longer identifiable, as it had ceased to exist, there was no legal person entitled to assert privilege and that a third party could not assert LPP. 
  • Dentons maintained that once LPP had attached to a communication, that would only cease having been waived by the client entitled to the privilege or when so ordered by statute.

The court ruling

The Court found in favour of Dentons with Lord Justice Lewison stating:

“In my judgment, therefore, the boundaries of legal advice privilege, within which it is absolute unless and until waived, are that the communication in question must be a communication between lawyer and client, made in connection with giving or receiving legal advice, otherwise than for an iniquitous purpose…

…legal advice privilege, once established, remains in existence unless and until it is waived.”

How Can We Assist? | Kangs National Criminal Defence Solicitors

If you require assistance in relation to any privileged material, or the status of potentially  privileged material of any nature we will be happy to advise and guide you.

We are experienced in addressing issues concerning privileged material in the context of serious fraud and money laundering investigations having acted in a wide range of such cases.

Our specialist team can be contacted through the following:

Hamraj Kang
07976 258171 | 020 7936 6396 | 0121 449 9888

John Veale
0121 449 9888 | 07989 521 210

Helen Holder
0121 449 9888 | 020 7936 6396 | 0161 817 5020

News insights, Serious Fraud, Services
A former Labour MP, Jared O’Mara, has received an immediate custodial sentence of four years having been found guilty, following his trial, of six counts of fraud relating to false expenses claims for work that he never carried out in respect of jobs that did not even exist. For further Press details please follow the […]
Criminal Litigation, News insights, Services
Kangs Solicitors has recently successfully defended a client facing an allegation of assault occasioning actual bodily harm arising from an incident forced upon him whilst he was simply conducting his  business, running a restaurant in London’s West End, when confronted with an unsavoury situation. Kangs Solicitors was instructed from the onset attending the interview under caution at Charing […]
Insolvency, News insights, Services
Kangs Solicitors has been instructed to defend claims against our client alleging breaches of Section 212 and 213 of the Insolvency Act 1986. The claims are being brought by the joint liquidators of our client’s company on the basis that our client allegedly knew that he and his company were participating in ‘Missing Trader Intra- Community’ Fraud’ […]

Get in touch

Need legal assistance? Contact our experienced team for prompt and professional support.
Old map of Birmingham