“The practice is based upon hard work and ability and doing the job for the client before anything else"

Legal 500 | 2020 Edition

Winner of the Legal 500 - 'Criminal, Fraud & Licensing Law Firm of the Year'

"One of, if not the best, criminal specialist firms in the country" (Legal 500)

Representation at Interviews & Court Examinations | sections 235 and 236 Insolvency Act 1986

Our team of insolvency lawyers is well versed in representing clients at:

  • Interviews with Insolvency Practitioners under section 235 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (‘the Act’), known as section 235 interviews, and
  • Oral examinations in court pursuant to section 236 of the Act, known as section 236 oral examinations.

How We Can Help | Our Insolvency Litigation Services

We understand that attending an interview with a liquidator/administrator or appearing in court for an oral examination can be a daunting experience for clients.

Should you receive such a request, from an Insolvency Practitioner, we are here to advise and assist you as follows:

  • discuss the history of the matter with you and gain an understanding of your company,
  • provide you with expert legal advice in terms that are easy to follow and understand,
  • explain the various options that are available to you,
  • advise whether any request from the Insolvency Practitioner is appropriate and proportionate and, if not, how to proceed,
  • represent you at any meeting/interview with the Insolvency Practitioner,
  • represent you in court at any oral examination ordered by the court.

We assist our clients through many types of insolvency issues and we use our experience to deliver the quickest and fastest cost-effective solutions available. 

Feel free to call us for an initial no obligation discussion:

Can the Insolvency Practitioner access Company records?

Section 234 of the Act gives the Insolvency Practitioner the authority to access the company books and records.

The Insolvency Practitioner, acting as a liquidator/administrator, can obtain a court order requiring any person who has in his possession or control any property, books, papers or records to which the company appears to be entitled, to pay, deliver, convey, surrender or transfer all such items to him.

Can the Insolvency Practitioner compel me to cooperate with him?

Section 235 of the Act imposes a duty on a wide range of persons associated, or previously associated with the company, to cooperate with the Insolvency Practitioner or Official Receiver.

The duty extends to:

  • providing the Insolvency Practitioner with information concerning the company and its promotion, formation, business, dealings, affairs or property as he may reasonably require, and
  • attending on the Insolvency Practitioner at such times as he may reasonably require. This includes an obligation to attend meetings and interviews.

The list of persons under such a duty to cooperate includes:

  • company directors and those who, are or have at any time, held any position as an officer of the company,
  • those who have taken part in the formation of the company at any time within one year before the date of administration/liquidation,
  • those who are in the employment of the company, or have been in its employment (including employment under a contract for services) within that year, and are, in the Insolvency Practitioner’s opinion, capable of giving information which he requires,
  • those who are, or have within that year been, officers of, or in the employment (including employment under a contract for services) of another company which is, or within that year was, an officer of the company in question, and
  • in the case of a company being wound up by the court, any person who has acted as Administrator, Administrative Receiver or Liquidator of the company.

The consequences of failing to cooperate:

  • If a person without reasonable excuse fails to comply with any obligation as set out above, he is liable to a fine and, for continued contravention, to a daily default fine.
  • The Insolvency Practitioner also has the option of exercising his powers under section 236 of the Act (see below) in order to seek the attendance of the relevant person before a court. This power is usually used where the relevant person has failed to cooperate with requests from the Insolvency Practitioner under section 235 of the Act.

Oral Examination in Court

Section 236 of the Act allows an Insolvency Practitioner to summons to court any person who may be able to provide him with information or records concerning the company’s affairs.

The person summonsed will be required to give oral evidence in court.

Who can be summonsed to Court?

The court, on application by the Insolvency Practitioner, can require the attendance of any of the following persons:

  • most commonly, company directors/any officer of the company,
  • any person known to have, or is suspected to have, in his possession any property of the company or suspected of being indebted to the company, or
  • any person who the court thinks capable of giving information concerning the promotion, formation, business, dealings, affairs or property of the company.

What Can the Court Order?

The court may require any person mentioned above to:

  • submit to the courtan account of his dealings with the company. An account submitted to the court must be contained in a witness statement verified by a statement of truth.
  • produce any books, papers or other records in his possession or under his control relating to the company.
  • pay to the Insolvency Practitioner any sum due to the company either as full or part settlement of the debt.

What happens if a person fails to attend Court?

A failure to attend court can have very serious consequences including the issuing of an arrest warrant.


  1. a person without reasonable excuse fails to appear before the court when he is summonsed to do so, or
  2. there are reasonable grounds for believing that a person has absconded, or is about to abscond, with a view to avoiding his appearance before the court,

then the court may, for the purpose of bringing that person and anything in his possession before the court, issue a warrant for:

  • the arrest of that person, and
  • the seizure of any books, papers, records, money or goods in that person’s possession.

In addition, the court may authorise:

  • a person arrested under such a warrant to be kept in custody, and
  • anything seized under such a warrant to be held until that person is brought before the court under the warrant or until such other time as the court may order.

Who Can I Contact For Help? | Kangs Insolvency Solicitors

We welcome new enquiries by telephone or email.

Our team of expert lawyers is here to guide you in relation to any insolvency related issues including section 235 interviews and section 236 oral examinations in court.

We are happy to provide an initial no obligation confidential consultation at our offices in London, Birmingham or Manchester or via video conferencing facilities to explore the issues in your case and to provide an assessment of how we can assist you.


Mr Stuart Southall | Head of Insolvency Team
0121 449 9888 | 020 7936 6396

Mr Tim Thompson
020 7936 6396 | 0121 449 9888

Mr Naz Maqsoom
0161 817 5020 | 0121 449 9888


    The team is intelligent, hardworking and determined to do a professional job

    Legal 500 | 2020 edition

    An acute attention to detail and a tenacity that clients really rate are features of this firm

    Legal 500 | 2020 edition

    The lawyers are ‘knowledgeable and approachable’

    Chambers & Partners | 2020 Edition

    Latest News

    Successful Outcome | Fine Limited | Kangs Food Safety Solicitors

    Kangs Solicitors has recently represented a company and its director facing prosecution for an offence contrary to Regulation 19(1) of the Food Safety and Hygiene Act (England) Regulations 2013.  Sukhdip Randhawa of Kangs Solicitors explains the steps undertaken to...

    Cryptocurrency As Property | Kangs Cryptocurrency Recovery Solicitors

    In a previous article we noted that the UK Jurisdiction Taskforce of the Law Society’s LawTech Delivery Panel had ruled that Cryptocurrency ought to be treated as property. For this article please click here: The Civil Crossover With Cryptocurrency Fraud ...


    34 St Paul's Square,
    Birmingham, B3 1QZ

    0121 449 9888


    Level 1, Devonshire House, One Mayfair Place
    Mayfair, London, W1J 8AJ

    020 7936 6396


    76 King Street
    Manchester, M2 4NH

    0161 817 5020