Slide background

    "Noted for the excellence of its white-collar defence practice"

    Chambers & Partners, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "Outstanding financial crime defence practice"

    Chambers & Partners, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "It’s a deluxe firm which pulls out all the stops for its clients"

    Chambers & Partners, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "They are the market leaders for serious crime’"

    Chambers & Partners, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "Kangs has an excellent reputation. They care about their clients and go the extra mile for them"

    Chambers & Partners, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "Kangs Solicitors is a standout firm"

    Legal 500, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "Kangs Solicitors is in the highest tier of firms"

    Legal 500, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "Hamraj Kang is noted for his very sharp legal brain"

    Legal 500, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "Kangs Solicitors fields a team of ‘technically able solicitors’
    and is well regarded for its serious crime and fraud work"

    Legal 500, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "Hamraj Kang is a shrewd tactician and very experienced"

    Legal 500, 2013 edition

    Slide background

    "What the team is known for - handles an extensive array of criminal matters
    including murder, drugs and white-collar crime"

    Chambers & Partners 2013 edition

    Slide background

    "Adept at dealing with cases that have an international dimension"

    Chambers & Partners 2013 edition

    Director Disqualification Orders and Undertakings | Solicitors defending Company Directors

    Criminal Defence Solicitors | Vat & Tax SolicitorsNEWSDirector Disqualification Orders and Undertakings | Solicitors defending Company Directors

    Sep

    9

    September 9 , 2016 | Posted by Kangs Solicitors |

    Director Disqualification Orders and Undertakings | Solicitors defending Company Directors

    Dean Phillips of Kangs Solicitors provides some guidance in relation to Company Director Disqualification Proceedings.

    The circumstances leading to Director Disqualification Proceedings frequently involve a number of various issues and allegations.

    Although the Court or Secretary of State may only be concerned as to whether a company director is “unfit” to be involved in the management of a company, the same circumstances may also give rise to other potential civil or, indeed, criminal proceedings being brought against the director.

    Once a Director Disqualification Order has been made, or a director has given an Undertaking containing a schedule of facts, consideration needs to be given as to the impact this Order or Undertaking could have on defending other proceedings which may be brought.

    Use of Judicial Findings | Director Disqualification Solicitors

    Where evidence has been presented and tested before a Judge in open Court, the Judge’s findings may be available for use in subsequent civil cases.

    This will often be on the grounds that the facts have already been litigated on or that forcing parties to re-litigate these facts could be an abuse of process.

    It should be emphasised that whether or not these prior findings will be binding is highly dependent on the facts of the case including:

    • The level of representations
    • The parties to the case
    • Whether the point was properly contested in the earlier hearing.

    Due to the higher standard of proof required in criminal cases, the findings and determinations made in civil cases are not binding on the criminal court.

    Can the Director’s Undertaking subsequently be used against him? | Defending Company Directors

    Although the fact that an Undertaking was accepted by the Secretary of State may be adduced in evidence  in subsequent proceedings, the relevance of the facts within the Schedule were considered in the cases of R v Blackspur Group plc (No.3) SoS v Davies (No.3) 2001 and Brazzo v Ruutledge [2011].

    In R v Blackspur, the Court held that the content of Schedules forming part of Undertakings cannot be relied upon on as evidential proof for the purposes of subsequent proceedings.

    Additionally, it was held that the only evidential use of the Schedule content is that the matters referred to are not disputed and are not admissions of those matters.

    In Brazzo v Routledge, it was accepted that the fact that such an Undertaking was signed can be put to a defendant in cross-examination  and he is allowed to explain the reasons why the undertaking was given.

    In the same case, it was also accepted that the defendant was entitled to confirm that the facts of the Schedule were completely disputed and that the Undertaking was only given in order to “reduce the period of disqualification and save costs”

    Considering the future implications | Solicitors defending Insolvency Service proceedings

    Giving an Undertaking may be advantageous in order to guard against the possibility of an anticipated adverse ruling being subsequently used against the former director in ancillary civil or criminal proceedings.

    If you are in the position where Director Disqualification Proceedings are being considered or, indeed, ongoing against you, you need to carefully consider your options before deciding how to respond if an Undertaking is offered or whether to offer one voluntarily.

    How can we help you? | Kangs Solicitors

    Kangs Solicitors have experience in dealing with all stages of Director Disqualification Proceedings and will be able to offer you:

    • a detailed appraisal of the situation
    • the potential options open to you
    • the various consequences that may flow from any course of action decided upon.

    Our team of solicitors has a proven track-record in defending Director Disqualification Proceedings and we will be happy to discuss your case with you.

    We provide a nationwide service from our offices in Birmingham, London and Manchester.

    Please feel free to contact any of our team as detailed below:

    Tim Thompson
    tthompson@kangssolicitors.co.uk
    0121 449 9888 | 020 7936 6396 | 07989 521210

    Hamraj Kang
    hkang@kangssolicitors.co.uk
    07976 258 171 | 020 7936 6396 | 0121 449 9888

    Print this page