Winner of the Legal 500 - 'Criminal, Fraud & Licensing Law Firm of the Year 2019'
"One of, if not the best, criminal specialist firms in the country" (Legal 500 | 2021 Edition)
Unexplained Wealth Order Solicitors
Unexplained Wealth Orders (UWOs) came into force in February 2018 and are a clear attempt by the UK authorities to bolster the proceeds of crime regime.
The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (‘POCA’) has been amended to allow the insertions of new sections (ss 362A to 362T) which now permit UWOs to be granted by the High Court.
Kangs Solicitors has a long-established proven track record of successfully representing clients in relation to all matters brought under POCA including Civil Recovery Proceedings in the High Court. UWOs are an investigatory power and a precursor to civil recovery action under Part 5 of POCA.
Since 1997, we have been deploying our extensive resources, expertise and skill to advise both corporate and individual clients in relation to both the civil and criminal asset recovery powers of the UK recovery agencies.
Our award-winning team of solicitors is nationally recognised for its work in relation to civil POCA proceedings.
What the team is known for: Advises on civil cases brought by the NCA under POCA including property freezing and civil recovery orders.
An example to the rest of the profession as to how a firm should be run, how clients should be treated and how a strong and technically gifted team of solicitors can be led to great success by a highly innovative and imaginative leadership’
Both the leading directories, the Legal 500 and Chambers & Partners, have recognised the firm’s excellence in the area of proceeds of crime for many years.
Call Us For Confidential Advice
Often, an individual, company or trust will not be aware of a UWO until it is served by an enforcement agency, usually the National Crime Agency (NCA).
We appreciate that a UWO can have a significant impact on a business and an individual. We aim to minimise the risk of adverse publicity and reputational damage that can ensue from a UWO as well as provide practical and innovative solutions for our clients.
If you have been served with a UWO by an enforcement agency such as the NCA, Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC), Serious Fraud Office (SFO), CPS or Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) or you are concerned about a potential civil recovery investigation into your assets, our team of expert civil POCA solicitors can be contacted for confidential and discrete advice as follows:
What Is A UWO?
A UWO is a civil investigatory tool available to an enforcement agency, most notably the NCA. It does not in itself lead directly to recovery action.
A UWO is an Order of the High Court which requires an individual, company or trust (‘the respondent’) to provide a statement explaining:
- the nature and extent of their interest in any particular property, and
- how the respondent acquired the property.
The respondent is usually targeted with a UWO when the value of property in their control appears to be disproportionate to their known income.
How Fair Are They? | Reverse Burden of Proof
It is for the respondent to prove that the property was obtained by legitimate means such as a legitimate inheritance or acquired using legitimate income.
Usually, it is for the State to prove matters but for UWOs the burden of proof has been reversed thereby placing the onus entirely on the respondent to prove the case on ‘a balance of probabilities’.
Who Can Apply For A UWO?
The following enforcement and investigating authorities are entitled to apply for UWOs:
- the NCA
- the FCA
- the SFO
- the Director of Public Prosecutions (England & Wales)
How Can A UWO Be Obtained?
The prosecuting authority must satisfy the High Court of a number of matters before a UWO will be granted including:
- the respondent holds the property,
- the value of the property is over £50,000 and
- there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the known sources of the respondent’s lawful income are insufficient to have enabled the respondent to obtain the property.
In addition to the above, the High Court must be satisfied that:
- the respondent is a Politically Exposed Person (PEP), or a ‘family member’, ‘close associate’ or ‘otherwise connected to’ a PEP
- there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the respondent (or someone ‘connected to the respondent’) is, or has been, involved in serious crime in the UK or overseas.
Who Can Be Served With A UWO?
The potential respondents can be categorised into four main groups as follows:
- a PEP is ‘an individual who is, or has been, entrusted with prominent public functions by an international organisation or by a State other than the UK or another EEA State’.
- An application for a UWO against a PEP does not require suspicion of serious criminality.
Individuals Connected to a Respondent who is a PEP
- any close ‘family member’ (spouses, parents, siblings, children)
- any ‘close associates’ or persons ‘connected to’ which can include business associates of the PEP and those that are co-owners of assets with the PEP.
Suspected Serious Criminals
- the High Court must be satisfied that serious crime has been committed which includes offences such as fraud & tax offences, bribery & corruption, arms trafficking, drug trafficking and money laundering.
- there is no need to prove to the criminal standard, of ‘beyond reasonable doubt’, that the respondent (or anyone connected to him) is involved in serious crime.
Individuals Connected to a Respondent Suspected of Serious Crime
These are likely to include:
- close family members of the respondent
- business associates of the respondent
- joint asset holders with the respondent.
Section 362I of POCA details the procedure for the prosecuting authority (usually the NCA) to follow when making an application to the High Court for a UWO.
- The application is usually made to a High Court Judge without notice to the respondent in order to prevent the dissipation of property.
- The respondent can be an individual, company or trust.
- The UWO applies to worldwide assets to include property and money.
- The respondent does not need to be resident or present in the UK as long as the respondent can be shown to be in control of the property.
Interim Freezing Orders
An Interim Freezing Order is generally sought by the enforcement agency at the same time as the UWO. The Interim Freezing Order has the effect of freezing the worldwide assets of the respondent.
The respondent has the right to apply for a variation of the Interim Freezing Order to deal with the property as well as to access frozen assets for the purposes of legal expenses and/or living expenses.
What Are The Terms of a UWO?
If the High Court Judge is satisfied on hearing the application from the enforcement agency that there are reasonable grounds for a UWO to be granted, the UWO must include the following in order to be valid:
- the name of the respondent,
- the property in question must be specified in the order,
- the form and manner in which the respondent is to provide the information must be specified in the order,
- who the respondent must give the explanation to, and
- the time period for providing the explanation.
What Are The Respondent’s Obligations?
The respondent must comply with the UWO, including the requirement to provide any disclosure and explanation requested, within the time frame specified.
The respondent (and the enforcement agency) is entitled to make an application to vary or discharge the UWO pursuant to section 362I (4) of POCA.
If the respondent complies with the UWO within the specified time limit, the NCA or other enforcement agency must consider the reply from the respondent in order to decide if any further action should be taken, such as a further UWO or to seek a Civil Recovery Order under Part 5 of POCA.
Protection From Self-Incrimination
The information obtained by the enforcement agency under a UWO cannot be used in criminal proceedings against the respondent, although there are certain exceptions to this general rule of protection.
However, the enforcement agency can use any information disclosed to it in response to a UWO and proceed to share this information with other national and international law enforcement agencies.
This intelligence gathering can also impact on third parties who may have featured in any response from the respondent in that it may lead to a civil or criminal case being instigated against them.
Failure To Comply With A UWO
Failure to comply with the UWO can include:
- the respondent failing to comply with the terms of the UWO at all, or
- the respondent, without reasonable excuse, failing to provide within the specified time limit the documents, material and information specified in the UWO, or
- the respondent, without reasonable excuse, providing only evidence that is deemed to be unsatisfactory.
Failure to comply with the UWO will result in the presumption that the property concerned is ‘recoverable property’ for the purposes of civil recovery proceedings. This presumption can be rebutted in the civil recovery proceedings.
Recoverable property means that the property has been obtained through unlawful conduct.
Criminal Sanctions & Contempt Of Court
The respondent commits a criminal offence if, in purported compliance with the UWO, a false or misleading statement is made to the enforcement authority.
If the respondent knows the statement to be false or misleading or recklessly makes a statement that is false or misleading in a material way, criminal sanctions could follow.
The offence is punishable by a maximum sentence of two years imprisonment.
If the enforcement agency suspects that the respondent has knowingly or recklessly provided material that is false or misleading in a material way, it may choose to bring contempt of court proceedings in the High Court which can also lead to a custodial sentence.
How Can We Help?
Our experienced team takes a proactive approach to UWOs and ensuing civil recovery proceedings.
We actively engage with the NCA or other prosecuting agency to achieve a positive result, whether through successful negotiation or a contested hearing in the High Court.
We are experts in this whole area of civil recovery and we work in conjunction with the leading barristers and QCs in the country in this specialist area of law.
The areas we can assist you with include:
- immediate advice and assistance after the service of a UWO
- challenging the basis and legality of a UWO and preparing an application for its discharge to the High Court
- advice on varying any aspect of a UWO
- responding to a UWO
- representing third parties affected by a UWO
- conduct of the High Court civil recovery litigation with a view to securing the protection of your position and assets
- using our previous experience of civil recovery cases to know when and how to apply appropriate pressure on the prosecuting authority for your benefit
- negotiating with the NCA or another prosecuting agency when appropriate.
- advising on any settlement proposals based on our experience, knowledge and awareness of the NCA’s current policy on settlement.
We provide advice and representation in the following related areas:
- Property Freezing Orders
- Civil Recovery Orders & Proceedings
- Account Freezing Orders and Account Forfeiture Orders
- Cash Seizures
- Restraint Orders
- Criminal POCA proceedings
Who Can I Contact For Help?
Hamraj Kang leads an award-winning team of lawyers nationally recognised for its excellence and expertise in civil POCA cases including all aspects of Civil Recovery Proceedings and Freezing Orders.
We welcome enquiries by telephone or email.
We provide an initial no obligation consultation from our offices in London, Birmingham and Manchester.
Alternatively, we provide initial consultations by telephone or video conferencing.
Advises on civil cases brought by the NCA under POCA, including property freezing and civil recovery orders
They are excellent in their client care and have a technical knowledge of POCA and asset forfeiture work which is, in my view, far superior to other firms
Dedicated white-collar crime team handling confiscations, restraint orders and cash seizures
Frequently represents high-profile individuals in proceeds of crime proceedings following convictions for fraud
Kangs Solicitors has recently secured an excellent result for a client who was facing trial at Worcester Crown Court for an alleged offence of burglary. Helen Holder of Kangs Solicitors explains the circumstances behind this successful result. Kangs...
The article posted to this website on 5 August 2020 entitled ‘Confiscation Orders | The Recoverable and Available Amounts’, explained the term ‘Available Amount’. Since that time, Kangs Solicitors has successfully represented a client who was facing an application by...
National Exhibition Centre Ltd (‘the company’) has received a substantial fine from Birmingham Magistrates’ Courts on 16 November 2020 after admitting offences contrary to Health & Safety Legislation which resulted in an accident causing serious head injuries to a...
In a recent posted to this site entitled ‘Recent Developments | Crypto Currency Solicitors’, we commented upon the clarification provided by courts on the legal status of cryptoassets, including confirmation that civil remedies may be exercised in their recovery when...
In Environment Agency v. David Lawrence, the Court of Appeal, whilst dismissing the appeal before it, clarified an issue of broader significance in relation to sentencing for environmental offences. Sukhdip Randhawa of Kangs Solicitors explains this Sentencing...
2 Wake Green Road, Moseley
Birmingham, B13 9EZ
0121 449 9888
9 Carmelite Street,
London, EC4Y 0DR
020 7936 6396
76 King Street
Manchester, M2 4NH