Call us0333 370 4333
22/05/24

Institute of Chartered Accountants | ICAEW

Institute of Chartered Accountants | ICAEW
Share

The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (‘ICAEW’) is a professional membership organisation which promotes, develops, and supports chartered accountants and students.

To become an ICAEW Chartered Accountant, the ACA qualification is required which encompasses professional development, ethics and professional scepticism, accountancy, finance and business modules and practical work experience.

ICAEW strives to protect the public by monitoring the quality of work conducted by its firms and members and can impose restrictions and penalties and, in extreme cases, exclusion from membership.

Regulatory and disciplinary responsibilities are conducted by the Professional Standards Department. Where the ICAEW’s professional standards have been breached, it will investigate, and take such regulatory action appropriate to the nature of the allegations made.

John Veale of KANGS outlines the ICAEW complaints process.

ICAEW Complaints Process

When a complaint is made to the ICAEW, it will initially assess whether there are grounds for the complaint, consider any evidence and ascertain whether the person against whom the complaint is made has been the subject of any disciplinary process.

Those complaints which have not arisen from a breach of the professional standards, such as a fee dispute or minor error by the chartered accountant, will be rejected and the complainant will be advised to seek their own legal advice.

Complaints which may be resolved by the accountant or firm without disciplinary action may be referred for conciliation if both parties agree.

Where the evidence suggests that there may be a case to answer, the complaint will be referred to the Conduct Committee.

Additionally, the matter may be passed to the Fitness to Practise Committee to determine whether the subject of the allegation is fit to participate in disciplinary proceedings.

The Conduct Committee

The Conduct Committee may determine that there is no case to answer. In specific circumstances, the complainant may seek a Case File Review.

Where the Conduct Committee decides that there is a Case to Answer, it may:

  • decide to take no further action,
  • invite the subject of the complaint to accept a caution,
  • invite the subject of the complaint to consent to an order,
  • refer the complaint to the Tribunal Committee.

The parties will not be able to put further representations before the Conduct Committee; it will make its decisions on the facts placed before the investigation.

Tribunals Committee

The complainant and the accused will have an opportunity to put forward any further evidence they would like the panel to consider. The Tribunal Committee will consider all the available evidence and reach a majority decision.

Having considered all representations and evidence, this Committee may:

  • dismiss the case, bringing an end to the matter,
  • impose a fine,
  • issue a reprimand,
  • suspend a Practicing Certificate,
  • impose exclusion from ICAEW membership,
  • issue a requirement to undertake specific training.

Appeals

If permission to appeal is granted, an appeal may be heard from the decisions of both the Fitness to Practise Committee and the Tribunals Committee. The Appeal Committee may either overturn or agree with the decisions under appeal.

How Can We help?

The Team at KANGS regularly assists fellow professionals who are faced with allegations of professional misconduct. We understand that any form of disciplinary action, including one conducted by ICAEW will be highly distressing given the potential consequences of any adverse outcome.

If we can be of any assistance at all, we are here to help, please contact us using the details below:

Tel:       0333 370 4333

Email: info@kangssolicitors.co.uk

We provide initial no obligation discussion at our three offices in London, Birmingham, and Manchester. Alternatively, discussions can be held through video conferencing or telephone.

Hamraj Kang

Hamraj Kang
Senior Partner

Email Phone Mobile
John Veale

John Veale
Partner

Email Phone
Tim Thompson

Tim Thompson
Partner

Email Phone
Regulatory
Following an unfortunate incident in which a coach driven by our client collided with the underside of a railway bridge, he was subsequently required to attend a Hearing before the Traffic Commissioner to determine his ongoing fitness to operate as a vocational driver. Mohammed Ahmed of KANGS outlines the circumstances and the events that led […]
06/10/25
Director Disqualification, Insolvency, Regulatory
KANGS has successfully represented our client, a former director of a liquidated hotel business, avoid Director Disqualification Proceedings under the Company Director’s Disqualification Act 1986, which sought to remove him from his role as company director. Nazaqat Maqsoom of KANGS outlines the circumstances leading to the investigation conducted by the Insolvency Service. The Circumstances of […]
02/10/25
Director Disqualification, Insolvency, Regulatory
Director disqualification, as set out in the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 (‘the Act’), serves to protect the public interest by preventing further misconduct on the part of an offending director. It does so by imposing a period during which the individual is disqualified from holding any office within a corporate body. Whilst the vast […]
22/09/25

Get in touch

Need legal assistance? Contact our experienced team for prompt and professional support.
Your privacy is important to us and all details you share will be kept confidential. Please note do not accept legal aid instructions.
Old map of Birmingham