Slide background

    "Noted for the excellence of its white-collar defence practice"

    Chambers & Partners, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "Outstanding financial crime defence practice"

    Chambers & Partners, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "It’s a deluxe firm which pulls out all the stops for its clients"

    Chambers & Partners, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "They are the market leaders for serious crime’"

    Chambers & Partners, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "Kangs has an excellent reputation. They care about their clients and go the extra mile for them"

    Chambers & Partners, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "Kangs Solicitors is a standout firm"

    Legal 500, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "Kangs Solicitors is in the highest tier of firms"

    Legal 500, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "Hamraj Kang is noted for his very sharp legal brain"

    Legal 500, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "Kangs Solicitors fields a team of ‘technically able solicitors’
    and is well regarded for its serious crime and fraud work"

    Legal 500, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "Hamraj Kang is a shrewd tactician and very experienced"

    Legal 500, 2013 edition

    Slide background

    "What the team is known for - handles an extensive array of criminal matters
    including murder, drugs and white-collar crime"

    Chambers & Partners 2013 edition

    Slide background

    "Adept at dealing with cases that have an international dimension"

    Chambers & Partners 2013 edition

    Confiscation Proceedings | Reconsideration of Available Amount

    Criminal Defence Solicitors | Vat & Tax SolicitorsNEWSConfiscation Proceedings | Reconsideration of Available Amount

    Nov

    25

    November 25 , 2016 | Posted by Kangs Solicitors |

    Confiscation Proceedings | Reconsideration of Available Amount

    Amandeep Murria of Kangs Solicitors discusses the position where there is a reconsideration of the ‘available amount’ in confiscation proceedings.

    The provisions are contained within the Proceeds of Crime Act (POCA) 2002.

    It is open to the Prosecution to apply at any time for a further calculation of the available amount.

    If the Court is satisfied, it may then vary the order by substituting the amount required to be paid by such amount as:

    1. It believes is just, but
    2. Does not exceed the amount found as the defendant’s benefit from his conduct

    Confiscation Law | Kangs Specialist Confiscation Solicitors

    Section 22 of POCA states:

    1) This section applies if:

    • a Court has made a confiscation order,.
    • the amount required to be paid was the amount found under section 7(2), and.
    • an application falling within subsection (2) applies to the Crown Court to make a new calculation of the available amount.

    2) These applicants fall within this subsection:

    • the Prosecutor
    • the Director; .
    • a receiver appointed under section 50 or 52

    3) In a case where this section applies the Court must make the new calculation and in doing so it must apply section 9 as if references to the time the confiscation order is made were to the time of the new calculation and as if references to the date of the confiscation order were to the date of the new calculation.

    4) If the amount found under the new calculation exceeds the relevant amount the Court may vary the order by substituting for the amount required to be paid such as:

    • it believes is just, but.
    • does not exceed the amount found as the defendant’s benefit from the conduct concerned.

    5) In deciding what is just the Court must have regard in particular to:

    • any fine imposed on the defendant for the offence (or any of the offences ) concerned;.
    • any order which falls within section 13 (3) and has been made against him in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned and has not already been taken into account by the Court in deciding what is the free property held by him for the purposes of section 9;
    • any order which has been made against him in respect of the offence (or any of the offences) concerned under section 130 of the Sentencing Act (compensation orders).

    6) But in deciding what is just the Court must not have regard to an order falling within subsection (5)( c) if a Court has made a direction under section 13 (6).

    7) In deciding under this section whether one amount exceeds another, the Court must take account of any change in the value of money.

    8) The relevant amount is:

    • the amount found as the available amount for the purposes of the confiscation order, if this section has not applied previously; .
    • the amount last found as the available amount in pursuance of this section , if this section has applied previously.

    9) The amount found as the defendant’s benefit from the conduct concerned is:

    • the amount so found when the confiscation order was made, or .
    • if one or more new calculations of the defendant’s benefit have been made under section 21 the amount found on the occasion of the last such calculation.

    Kangs Solicitors | Confiscation and POCA Solicitors

    At Kangs Solicitors we have a dedicated team specialising in Confiscation, POCA, Asset Forfeiture and Restraint Order work and we are happy to provide clients and fellow professionals with an initial no obligation consultation.

    There have been a number of instances when those already made subject to Confiscation Orders have returned to Court because of the application of Section 22 of POCA.

    Our experience is that such applications are at an all-time high. We have assisted many clients in recent months faced with such applications by the prosecuting authorities.

    Should you receive notification of a ‘section 22 application’, we can help you prepare a response to it and represent you in Court at any subsequent hearing.

    Arrangements can be made to meet at any of our 3 offices – Birmingham, London or Manchester.

    Please feel free to contact our team of confiscation solicitors through one of the following:

    Amandeep Murria
    amurria@kangssolicitors.co.uk
    Tel: 0121 449 9888 | 020 7936 6396

    John Veale
    jveale@kangssolicitors.co.uk
    Tel: 020 7936 6396 | 0121 449 9888

    Print this page