Call us0333 370 4333
22/05/18

Employees Suffer Serious Burns | Kangs Health and Safety Solicitors

Share

An East Midlands foundry (‘the foundry’) has been fined £60,000 and ordered to pay costs of more than £1,000 by Derbyshire Magistrates’ Court after two employees suffered serious burns from an electrical flashover.

Steven Micklewright of Kangs Solicitors sets out the circumstances.

The Circumstances | Kangs National Health and Safety Team

  • In late 2016, two employees were working to reinstate the power supply to one of the furnaces after repair works.
  • After replacing the fuses, they shut the fuse panel door, which engaged the interlock, and tried to close the main switch.
  • As this would not operate, they opened the panel door and decided to bypass the interlock which resulted in an electrical flashover.
  • Both employees suffered serious burns requiring surgery.
  • Health and Safety Executive discovered that, at the time of the incident, the foundry did not maintain:
  1. Any electrical safety rules
  2. Safe systems of work or a permit system
  3. Recorded systems or rules for working with electricity
  4. Any method of risk assessment
  • Additionally, the foundry allowed employees to work on live conductors without consideration of the conditions which are stipulated in law.

The Relevant Health and Safety Law | Kangs Regulatory Law Advisors

Electricity at Work Regulations 1989.

Regulation 4(3) states:

Every work activity, including operation, use and maintenance of a system and work near a system, shall be carried out in such a manner as not to give rise, so far as is reasonably practicable, to danger’.

Regulation 14 states:

No person shall be engaged in any work activity on or so near any live conductor (other than one suitably covered with insulating material so as to prevent danger) that danger may arise unless

(a) it is unreasonable in all the circumstances for it to be dead; and

(b) it is reasonable in all the circumstances for him to be at work on or near it while it is live; and

(c) suitable precautions (including where necessary the provision of suitable protective equipment) are taken to prevent injury.

The Hearing | Electrical Regulations | Kangs Regulatory Solicitors

The foundry pleaded guilty, was fined £60,000 and ordered to pay costs of more than £1,000.

HSE Inspector Leigh Stanley said:

“Those in control of work have a responsibility to devise safe methods of working and to provide the necessary information, instruction and training to their workers in the safe system of working. If a suitable safe system of work had been in place prior to the incident, the injuries sustained by the employees could have been prevented.”

How Can We Help? | Kangs Health and Safety Solicitors

Kangs Solicitors have a wealth of knowledge and experience in dealing with all matters of health and safety law.

Our specialist solicitors are able to provide advice and assistance throughout the entire criminal process, from the initial intervention by the Health and Safety Executive through to trial.

Who Can I Contact For Help? | Kangs Criminal Defence Solicitors

If you are facing prosecution or an interview under caution, please feel free to contact our team through any of the solicitors named below who will be happy to provide you with some initial advice and assistance.

Hamraj Kang
hkang@kangssolicitors.co.uk
07976 258171 | 020 7936 6396 | 0121 449 9888

Suki Randhawa
srandhawa@kangssolicitors.co.uk
0121 449 9888 | 020 7936 6396

New Sentencing Guidelines (‘the New Guidelines’), which come into effect on 1st January 2020, have been issued covering adults convicted of Public Order Offences. John Veale of Kangs Solicitors comments upon the changes. Background | Kangs Sentencing Advisory Team In August 2008, the Sentencing Guidelines Council published Magistrates’ Court Sentencing Guidelines in respect of such […]
01/11/19
The Court of Appeal has recently handed down an important Judgement protecting legal professional privilege (‘LPP’). Helen Holder of Kangs Solicitors explains the nature of LPP. What is Legal Professional Privilege? | Kangs Criminal Law Advisory Team LPP protects all communications between professional legal advisors and their clients from being disclosed without each individual client’s […]
31/10/19
A cut-throat defence arises where, during criminal proceedings, a defendant gives evidence on his own behalf and which is not only likely to strengthen the prosecution case but is designed to damage a co-defendant’s case to the extent that it may go as far as blaming the co-defendant whilst endeavouring to exonerate himself. John Veale […]
30/10/19

Get in touch

Need legal assistance? Contact our experienced team for prompt and professional support.
Your privacy is important to us and all details you share will be kept confidential. Please note do not accept legal aid instructions.
Old map of Birmingham