26/06/17

Insider Dealing | Kangs Criminal Defence Solicitors

Share

The Legislation

Insider dealing is a criminal offence (‘the offence’) governed by sections 52 and 53 of the Criminal Justice Act 1993 (‘the Act’).

The Offence | Kangs Criminal Advisory Solicitors

Section 52 of the Act provides that a person is guilty of the offence if he:

  • Has information as an insider and deals in securities that are price- affected securities in relation to that information where the acquisition or disposal in question occurs on a regulated market, or that the person dealing relies on a professional intermediary or is himself acting as a professional intermediary
  • Encourages another to deal in securities that are price affected securities in relation to the information, whether or not that other person is aware they are price affected, knowing or having reasonable cause to believe the dealing occurs on a regulated market or that the person dealing relies on a professional intermediary or is himself acting as a professional intermediary
  • Passes the information on to another in circumstances which are not part of the proper performance of their employment, position or profession

What Information Is Relevant? | Kangs Criminal Lawyers

Any Information that, if made public, is likely to have a significant effect of the price of the security in question which may include advance notice of:

  • Information in regard to a company’s performance ahead of the release of awaited accounts
  • A take- over bid or
  • The resignation/appointment of a key member of staff

Who Is An Insider? | Kangs Solicitors

A person is an insider if they hold information as director, employee or shareholder of the company issuing the security or has access to the information via their employment, profession or office.

Defences | Kangs Criminal Defence Preparation Team

Section 53 of the Act provides that a person is not guilty of the offence if he:

  • Did not expect, at that time, that the dealing would result in a profit that could be attributed to the information affecting the price of the security
  • Had reasonable grounds to believe that there had been sufficient disclosure of the information with the result that no one would be prejudiced by not having it
  • Would have acted in exactly the same manner without the information
  • Did not expect any person to deal in securities to which the information related
  • Did not expect that a profit would be made attributable to the fact that the information would affect the price of the security to which it related

Penalties | Kangs Criminal Trial Solicitors

Section 61 of the Act provides that the offence, usually prosecuted by the Financial Conduct Authority,  can only be prosecuted with the consent of Secretary of State or the Director of Public Prosecutions.

The penalties are:

  • On summary conviction a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum and or a term of imprisonment not exceeding twelve months.
  • On conviction on indictment, to a fine and or a term of imprisonment not exceeding seven years.

How Can We Help? | Kangs Financial Fraud team

Kangs provides an expert  team of solicitors experienced in FCA and financial investigations of every nature from the outset through to trial.

Our team is led by Hamraj Kang who recognised as a leader in this field and is ranked as a ‘star individual’ in the legal directory Chambers & Partners.

If we can be of assistance, our Team is available via telephone 0333 370 4333 and by email info@kangssolicitors.co.uk.

We provide initial no obligation discussion at our three offices in London, Birmingham and Manchester.

Alternatively, discussions can be held virtually through live conferencing or telephone.

Hamraj Kangs 0340 BW scaled e1690223799706

Hamraj Kang

Email Hamraj

07976 258171

020 7936 6396

0121 449 9888

John Veale 1

John Veale

Email John

0121 449 9888

020 7936 6396

0161 817 5020

Tim Kangs 0035 BW scaled e1690222566960

Tim Thompson

Email Tim

0121 449 9888

020 7936 6396

0161 817 5020

Financial Investigations, Services
By virtue of The Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) (Threshold Amount) Order 2022 the threshold amount specified in section 339A of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (‘POCA’) increased from £250 to £1000 on 5 January 2023. The threshold amount is the value of criminal property below which a bank or similar firm (a deposit-taking body, electronic money or payment […]
22/02/23
Financial Investigations, POCA, Trading Standards
At the end of August 2019, Birmingham Crown Court ordered Confiscation Proceedings against the defendant, a shop owner, charged with offences under the Tobacco and Related Products Regulations 2016, the Trade Marks Act 1994 and Fraud Act 2006.  Helen Holder of Kangs Solicitors reports the outcome. The Offences | Kangs Trading Standards Team The defendant […]
25/11/19
Civil Fraud, Financial Investigations, Unexplained Wealth Orders
Following a slow uptake, UK investigators and enforcement authorities are warming to the deployment of an Unexplained Wealth Order (“an UWO”) in the pursuit of the recovery of assets from anyone suspected of having benefited from their involvement in crime. Owners of substantial property portfolios, seemingly with particular regard to London, are in the firing […]
11/11/19

Get in touch

Need legal assistance? Contact our experienced team for prompt and professional support.
Old map of Birmingham