15/08/19

Private Prosecutions | New Code | Kangs Private Prosecutions Solicitors

Share

The Private Prosecutors’ Association has recently published a code for Private Prosecutors ‘to provide a benchmark in the conduct of private prosecutions.’

Kangs Solicitors has previously commented upon the emergence of private prosecutions and for further information, please follow the link for a greater insight:

Private Criminal Prosecutions | An Alternative To Civil Proceedings?

Helen Holder of Kangs Solicitors comments generally.

The Code | Kangs Private Prosecution Lawyers

Private Prosecutors:

  • Must observe the highest standards of integrity and have regard for the public interest
  • Are subject to the same obligations as a public prosecuting authority
  • Owe a duty to the Court to ensure that the proceedings are fair and that the case is dealt with justly
  • Must withdraw or refuse to act if they consider the conduct of the party  pursuing the prosecution to be improper or vexatious

Crown Prosecution Service Code:    

  • Although this does not apply to private prosecutions, it is good practice to use it as a benchmark 
  • If the full code is not met i.e. the evidential and public interest tests, it is likely that the advice will be not to institute a private prosecution

CPS:

There is no duty upon a private prosecutor to inform the CPS of the proceedings. However:

  1. Some offences require the consent of the Director of Public Prosecutions before a summons can be issued
  2. Where the CPS is informed it may
  3. Allow the private prosecution to continue without intervening
  4. Take it over and continue it
  5. Discontinue it or stop it

Procedural Rules:

The rules that apply to public authority prosecutors apply to private prosecutors such as:  

  1. Obtaining evidence by way of investigation ensuring admissibility, being fair and balanced, not an abuse and acting impartially, objectively and independently
  2. Conducting interviews in compliance with the Police and Criminal Evidence Acts Codes of Practice
  3.  Ensuring that a thorough review is undertaken of all unused material in order to comply with duties of disclosure

Advantages of a Private Prosecution | Kangs Private Prosecution Solicitors

A private prosecution:

  1. May proceed where a public body lacks the resources or the will to prosecute
  2. Will often be quicker
  3. Will be more focused and efficient than a public prosecution
  4. May be cheaper that High Court Proceedings
  5. Can provide remedies for those who have suffered harm either economic or physical
  6. May lead to costs being recovered

Contrast | Civil and Criminal Proceedings | Kangs Private Prosecution Team

  • Civil proceedings seek financial redress whereas a criminal prosecution is intended to punish the alleged offender which may not necessarily result in a financial recovery
  • A private prosecution should seek to punish those alleged to have committed a criminal offence and should not be launched purely as a means to seek a financial settlement
  • Where both civil and criminal proceedings have been issued, careful consideration must be given as to whether they should be allowed to run concurrently or whether the civil proceedings should be stayed pending the outcome of the criminal proceedings
  • There may be significant procedural benefits in staying the civil proceedings for example, awaiting disclosure in criminal proceedings
  • A successful criminal prosecution could carry significant weight in the civil proceedings where they are founded on the same factual basis in both jurisdictions

How Can We Assist You? | Kangs Private Prosecution Solicitors

The team at Kangs Solicitors has considerable experience in handling private prosecutions on behalf of clients in both the issue and defence of such proceedings.

If we can be of assistance, our Team is available via telephone 0333 370 4333 and by email info@kangssolicitors.co.uk.

We provide initial no obligation discussion at our three offices in London, Birmingham and Manchester.

Alternatively, discussions can be held virtually through live conferencing or telephone.

Hamraj Kangs 0340 BW scaled e1690223799706

Hamraj Kang

Email Hamraj

07976 258171

020 7936 6396

0121 449 9888

Tim Kangs 0035 BW scaled e1690222566960

Tim Thompson

Email Tim

0121 449 9888

020 7936 6396

0161 817 5020

Helen Kangs 0491 BW

Helen Holder

Email Helen

0121 449 9888

020 7936 6396

Criminal Litigation
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) is an important piece of legislation that governs the powers and procedures of police officers when conducting criminal investigations, making arrests and gathering evidence. It establishes guidelines for the detention, questioning, and treatment of suspects, as well as rules for the conduct of searches and seizures. PACE […]
08/05/24
Criminal Litigation, Sports Law
The Football Spectators Act 1989 (‘the Act’) not only created specific offences relating to fan behaviour, such as throwing objects onto the pitch or into the crowd, racist chanting, violence against persons or property and alcohol-related offences. It also ushered in the implementation of Football Banning Orders. A Football Banning Order may be imposed on […]
03/05/24
Criminal Litigation
The Unduly Lenient Sentence Scheme (‘ULS’) enables any person to request a review by the Attorney General of a Crown Court Sentence if they feel the sentence passed is considered too lenient. However, an Unduly Lenient Sentence only applies to a sentence that is unduly lenient, as opposed to lenient: ‘… where it falls outside […]
02/05/24

Get in touch