Call us0333 370 4333
18/07/19

Worker Fatally Injured | Company Fined

Share

Peterborough Crown Court imposed a substantial fine on a Cambridgeshire based company (‘the company’) which pleaded guilty to breaches of Health & Safety Regulations which resulted in an employee being fatally injured.     

 

Amandeep Murria of Kangs Solicitors sets out the circumstances.

The Circumstances 

 

  • The site manager, an employee of more than twenty years, was fatally injured when struck by a lorry whilst on the premises.
  • Although the driver of the lorry had checked his mirrors, he did not see the site manager thereby causing the fatal accident.

The Health & Safety Executive conducted a thorough investigation and concluded that the company:

‘had failed to implement safety measures for their employees, ensuring there was proper and adequate access around the site, avoiding large moving vehicles.’

The Relevant Law

 

The Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 (‘the Act’) provides:

‘2  General
duties of employers to their employees.

(1) It shall be the duty of every employer to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees.

 

(2) Without prejudice to the generality of an employer’s duty under the preceding subsection, the matters to which that duty extends include in particular—

 

(a) the provision and maintenance of plant and systems of work that are, so far as is reasonably practicable, safe and without risks to health;

 

(b) arrangements for ensuring, so far as is reasonably practicable, safety and absence of risks to health in connection with the use, handling, storage and transport of articles and substances;

 

(c) the provision of such information, instruction, training and supervision as is necessary to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health and safety at work of his employees;

 

(d) so far as is reasonably practicable as regards any place of work under the employer’s control, the maintenance of it in a condition that is safe and without risks to health and the provision and maintenance of means of access to and egress from it that are safe and without such risks;

 

(e) the provision and maintenance of a working environment for his employees that is, so far as is reasonably practicable, safe, without risks to health, and adequate as regards facilities and arrangements for their welfare at work.’

 

The Hearing 

 

The company pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 2 (1) of the Act and was:

  • fined £180,000   
  • ordered to pay Prosecution Costs of £120,000      

An Inspector from the Health & Safety Executive, Stephen Faulkner, was quoted as saying:

“This was a tragic and wholly avoidable incident caused by failure of the host company to undertake a number of simple measures.”

How Can We Help? 

 

Kangs Solicitors has a wealth of knowledge and experience in dealing with all matters of health and safety law.

Our specialist solicitors are able to provide advice and assistance throughout the entire criminal process, from the initial intervention by the Health and Safety Executive through to enforcement, interview under caution and ultimately the defence of any ensuing criminal
prosecution.

 

Who Can I Contact For Help?

 

Please feel free to contact our team through any of the solicitors named below who will be happy to provide you with some initial advice and assistance.

Hamraj Kang
hkang@kangssolicitors.co.uk
07976 258171 | 020 7936 6396 | 0121 449 9888

John Veale
jveale@kangssolicitors.co.uk
0121 449 9888 | 020 7936 6396

Amandeep Murria
amurria@kangssolicitors.co.uk
020 7936 6396 | 0121 449 9888

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]

DBS, Regulatory
KANGS recently assisted our client, a Senior Healthcare Practitioner, in opposing a 'Minded to Bar' letter served by the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) following an incident at work. Helen Holder of KANGS explains how we guided our client and achieved this successful outcome. The Circumstances The ‘Minded to Bar’ letter alleged that our client […]
23/10/25
Regulatory
Following an unfortunate incident in which a coach driven by our client collided with the underside of a railway bridge, he was subsequently required to attend a Hearing before the Traffic Commissioner to determine his ongoing fitness to operate as a vocational driver. Mohammed Ahmed of KANGS outlines the circumstances and the events that led […]
06/10/25
Director Disqualification, Insolvency, Regulatory
KANGS has successfully represented our client, a former director of a liquidated hotel business, avoid Director Disqualification Proceedings under the Company Director’s Disqualification Act 1986, which sought to remove him from his role as company director. Nazaqat Maqsoom of KANGS outlines the circumstances leading to the investigation conducted by the Insolvency Service. The Circumstances of […]
02/10/25

Get in touch

Need legal assistance? Contact our experienced team for prompt and professional support.
Your privacy is important to us and all details you share will be kept confidential. Please note do not accept legal aid instructions.
Old map of Birmingham