Slide background

    "Noted for the excellence of its white-collar defence practice"

    Chambers & Partners, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "Outstanding financial crime defence practice"

    Chambers & Partners, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "It’s a deluxe firm which pulls out all the stops for its clients"

    Chambers & Partners, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "They are the market leaders for serious crime’"

    Chambers & Partners, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "Kangs has an excellent reputation. They care about their clients and go the extra mile for them"

    Chambers & Partners, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "Kangs Solicitors is a standout firm"

    Legal 500, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "Kangs Solicitors is in the highest tier of firms"

    Legal 500, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "Hamraj Kang is noted for his very sharp legal brain"

    Legal 500, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "Kangs Solicitors fields a team of ‘technically able solicitors’
    and is well regarded for its serious crime and fraud work"

    Legal 500, 2014 edition

    Slide background

    "Hamraj Kang is a shrewd tactician and very experienced"

    Legal 500, 2013 edition

    Slide background

    "What the team is known for - handles an extensive array of criminal matters
    including murder, drugs and white-collar crime"

    Chambers & Partners 2013 edition

    Slide background

    "Adept at dealing with cases that have an international dimension"

    Chambers & Partners 2013 edition

    Gross Negligence Manslaughter|Kangs Criminal Solicitors

    Criminal Defence Solicitors | Vat & Tax SolicitorsNEWSGross Negligence Manslaughter|Kangs Criminal Solicitors

    Feb

    8

    February 8 , 2017 | Posted by Kangs Solicitors |

    Gross Negligence Manslaughter|Kangs Criminal Solicitors

    John Veale of Kangs Solicitors considers the law and procedure in relation to the offence.

    The Offence

    Gross negligence manslaughter (‘the offence’) arises when a person dies as a result of the negligence of another.

    The offence is a form of involuntary manslaughter where:

    • the defendant is ostensibly acting lawfully but
    • acts in such a way as to render the action criminal and
    • can be committed by omission.

    The Test

    A four stage test as to whether or not the offence has been committed is set out in case law as follows:

    • A duty of care to the deceased must have existed
    • There must have been a breach of that duty.
    • The breach must have caused or contributed significantly to the death.
    • The breach should be characterised as gross negligence , and therefore a crime

    Duty of Care

    • There is no general duty of care owed by one person to another.
    • A duty of care will arise from an act of a person where the requirements of foreseeability, proximity, fairness, justice and reasonableness establish such a duty.
    • The duty exists even where the defendant and the deceased were engaged in an unlawful activity
    • The duty can arise from a contract of employment

    Examples of breaches| Kangs Regulatory Defence Solicitors

    • As the result of a dumper lorry crashing in Bath, four people were killed. The director of the company which operated the lorry and the person responsible for its maintenance were found guilty of gross negligence manslaughter as the lorry had been very poorly maintained.
    • In a recent case, a boyfriend failed to take action to save his girlfriend from drowning. He  pleaded guilty to the offence of gross negligence manslaughter.
    • A director was convicted after encouraging workers to enter apple storage siloes to retrieve the best quality apples to be shown at a competition. Two of the workers died from the effects of suffocation.

    Breach of the Duty|Causation | Kangs Criminal Defence Solicitors

    The test of whether a duty of care has been breached is an objective one, based upon the defendant’s position at the time of the event, and what a ‘reasonable person’ would have done in those circumstances.

    The act or the omission of the accused must be connected to the death and the prosecution must prove to the satisfaction of  a jury that the breach made more than a minimum contribution to the death.

    How Can We Help You? | Kangs Health & Safety Solicitors

    We have a team of solicitors who are experienced in conducting health and safety cases from the initial investigation/interview stage right through to trial proceedings in court.

    Please feel free to contact our team through any of the lawyers named below who will be happy to provide you with some initial advice and an informal chat about any of the issues in this article which  may be of interest to you.

    Hamraj Kang
    hkang@kangssolicitors.co.uk
    07976 258171 | 020 7936 6396 | 0121 449 9888

    John Veale
    jveale@kangssolicitors.co.uk
    07779 0559070121 449 9888 | 020 7936 6396

    Tim Thompson
    tthompson@kangssolicitors.co.uk
    0121 449 9888 | 020 7936 6396 | 07710 67 77 67 

    Print this page