Call us 0333 370 4333
24/05/24

Sexual Harm Prevention Orders (SHPO) | Landmark Case Bans Use of AI Tools

Sexual Harm Prevention Orders (SHPO) | Landmark Case Bans Use of AI Tools
Share

The Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 introduced Sexual Harm Preventions Orders (a ‘SHPO’), to replace Sexual Offences Prevention Orders. A SHPO aims to protect the public from sexual harm by restricting the activities of the person against whom they are issued. For example, prohibiting the downloading of indecent images of children or access to the internet.

A SHPO will frequently be imposed against an offender convicted of an online sexual offence involving children.

In a recent UK case, a sex offender was made subject to a SHPO which contained a prohibition against using Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools for a period of five years.

Helen Holder of KANGS Solicitors comments upon the relevant law and this landmark case.

The Relevant Law

A SHPO can be made against any offender convicted or cautioned in respect of offences scheduled in the Sexual Offences Act 2003 as follows:

Schedule 3

An extensive list of sexual offences includes:

  • rape
  • sexual assault
  • indecent assault
  • inciting incestuous sexual intercourse
  • possession/distribution of indecent images.

Schedule 5

Non-sexual offences include:

  • murder
  • manslaughter
  • kidnapping
  • false imprisonment
  • threats to kill.

The Case in Focus

It was discovered that the defendant was in possession of at least one thousand indecent images of children.

As part of the SHPO imposed upon the offender, he was ordered not to use, visit, or access AI generation tools, without the prior permission of Police.

The banned AI tools include, for instance, text-to-image generators, which can produce lifelike pictures based on a written command, and ‘nudifying’ websites used to make explicit ‘deepfakes’.

This is the first time a UK Sentencing Court has imposed a prohibition on accessing AI tools.

Imposition of a SHPO

A SHPO is often imposed at the same time a convicted person is sentenced in respect of the crime committed. However, it may be the case that it will not be imposed until a later date, such as when the offender is released from prison to protect the public from re-offending.
The period of time for which the SHPO is imposed will be dependent upon the seriousness of the offence.

Imposed obligations may be comprehensive and include:

  • reporting to the Police,
  • restrictions from contacting specified persons,
  • prohibition from visiting particular locations,
  • use of technology such as computers and mobile phones.

Consequences following Breach of a SHPO

Breaching the terms of a SHPO is a serious offence which may result in criminal charges. As an ‘either way’ offence, such breach may be tried in the Magistrates’ Court or a Crown Court.

Conviction in the Magistrates’ Court may result in a fine, imprisonment for a term not exceeding the general limit in a Magistrates’ Court or both.

Conviction in the Crown Court may result in imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years.

How Can We Help?

The Government recently announced it will be illegal to make sexually explicit ‘deepfakes’ of anyone aged over eighteen without consent and that a new offence will be introduced in due course.

Accordingly, it is clear that the development of SHPOs is ongoing, necessitating the need to be vigilant to the development of the law as it occurs. The Team at KANGS, as a matter of course remains alert to variations in the law whether resulting from Statute or Case Law.

It is imperative that anybody accused of criminal conduct of any nature, including any sexual offence, should seek immediate professional guidance and legal advice.

The Team at KANGS appreciates the strain on individuals and their families when facing allegations of a sexual nature, and we are here to assist you to alleviate such difficulties and pressures.

Tel:       0333 370 4333

Email: info@kangssolicitors.co.uk

We provide initial no obligation discussion at our three offices in London, Birmingham, and Manchester. Alternatively, discussions can be held through video conferencing or telephone.

Helen Holder

Helen Holder
Partner

Email Phone
Mohammed Ahmed

Mohammed Ahmed
Associate

Email Phone
Sukhdip Randhawa

Sukhdip Randhawa
Legal Director

Email Phone
Criminal Litigation, Financial Investigations, Regulatory
KANGS has assisted a senior National Health Service (NHS) Consultant in successfully defending fraud allegations. The investigators alleged that he had, fraudulently undertaken and received payment for private clinical work during periods when he was contracted to, and being paid by the NHS. Following the detailed preparation of our client’s defence by the team at […]
21/07/26
Criminal Litigation, Regulatory
Where following an RSPCA investigation the owner of an animal is prosecuted and convicted under the Animal Welfare Act 2006 (‘the Act’) for an animal cruelty offence, such as causing ‘unnecessary suffering to an animal’, the Court may, as one of its options, make an Order depriving that person of ownership of the animal and […]
02/07/26
Criminal Litigation
A suspended sentence is a custodial sentence imposed by the court which is not served immediately. Instead, it is suspended for a specified operational period, during which the offender must comply with conditions imposed by the court and refrain from committing further offences. Failure to do so may result in the original custodial sentence being […]
23/06/26

Get in touch

Need legal assistance? Contact our experienced team for prompt and professional support.
Your privacy is important to us and all details you share will be kept confidential. Please note we do not accept legal aid instructions.

Send an enquiry

    This form is protected by Cloudfare Turnstile.
    Cloudfare Privacy Policy.

    Old map of Birmingham
    0333 370 4333