Conveying Drugs Into Prison | Kangs Criminal Defence Solicitors


The Court of Appeal has recently refused the appeal, against the length of sentence, brought by a man who had pleaded guilty to taking three separate packages containing cannabis resin, cannabis bush and twenty steroid tablets into a prison at the request of his cousin.

Nazaqat Maqsoom of Kangs Solicitors comments on the sentencing and the ruling from the Court of Appeal.  

The Circumstances | Kangs Serious Crime Defence Solicitors

  • Whilst passing a sentence of eighteen months` imprisonment, the Judge observed that ‘the smuggling of drugs into prison undermines the order of our custodial institutions and causes problems for those who are responsible for supervising prisons and looking after the welfare of inmates.’
  • The Judge also commented that a conviction for smuggling drugs into prison significantly exceeds the threshold at which the requirement for custody falls into consideration.
  • The appeal pursued by the appellant was based upon the premise that the Drug Sentencing Guidelines indicated that a high-level Community Order was the appropriate sentence.

The Court Of Appeal Decision | Kangs Criminal Appeal Solicitors

In refusing the appeal the Court of Appeal observed:

  • The drugs guidelines are of course helpful in sentencing offences of this sort, but the reality here is that the mischief is bringing the drugs into prison.
  • That is a very significant aggravating feature and whilst we rely upon the guidelines for some assistance, they cannot determine the final prison sentence to be imposed. In the view of this court, this falls way outside the range which [Counsel] has identified to us today.
  • The taking into prison of drugs is pernicious. It causes discipline problems within any custodial institution; it endangers the safety of the inmates and staff and adds greatly to the burden of trying to impose discipline.
  • In the view of this court, having been given full credit for the plea, which he had entered at the earliest opportunity, the total sentence of 18 months cannot be said either to be wrong in principle or manifestly excessive, reflecting as it does a total sentence for three separate offences of bringing different items into prison on this occasion.’

How Can We Help? | Kangs Specialist Criminal Defence Solicitors

Conveying any item, including controlled drugs, into or out of prison is a very serious offence and conviction can result in a sentence of up to ten years’ imprisonment.

For previous articles appearing on the Kangs website on this topic please follow the links:

At Kangs Solicitors our experienced team defends clients being investigated for or charged with crimes of every conceivable nature, including conveying prohibited articles into prison.

Who Should I Contact? | Kangs National Criminal Defence Solicitors

At Kangs Solicitors our Team offers expert advice across all aspects of criminal proceedings and should you require assistance please do not hesitate to contact us through any of the following:

Sukhdip Randhawa
0121 449 9888 | 020 7936 6396 | 07989 521 210 (24hr Emergency Number)

Helen Holder
0121 449 9888 | 020 7936 6396

Amandeep Murria
020 7936 6396 | 0121 449 9888

News insights, Serious Fraud, Services
A former Labour MP, Jared O’Mara, has received an immediate custodial sentence of four years having been found guilty, following his trial, of six counts of fraud relating to false expenses claims for work that he never carried out in respect of jobs that did not even exist. For further Press details please follow the […]
Criminal Litigation, News insights, Services
Kangs Solicitors has recently successfully defended a client facing an allegation of assault occasioning actual bodily harm arising from an incident forced upon him whilst he was simply conducting his  business, running a restaurant in London’s West End, when confronted with an unsavoury situation. Kangs Solicitors was instructed from the onset attending the interview under caution at Charing […]
Insolvency, News insights, Services
Kangs Solicitors has been instructed to defend claims against our client alleging breaches of Section 212 and 213 of the Insolvency Act 1986. The claims are being brought by the joint liquidators of our client’s company on the basis that our client allegedly knew that he and his company were participating in ‘Missing Trader Intra- Community’ Fraud’ […]

Get in touch