13/06/19

Delighted Client Retains Liberty | Kangs Criminal Defence Solicitors

Share

Kangs Solicitors has enabled a client charged with robbery and possession of an offensive weapon to retain his liberty.

Nazaqat Maqsoom of Kangs Solicitors reports upon the circumstances. 

The Circumstances | Kangs Criminal Defence Solicitors

  • Our client was one of a group which stole cash from premises when a weapon and violence were used.
  • Our client was the only person arrested and was identified by CCTV and a witness.

How We Assisted Our Client | Kangs Solicitors Trial Preparation Team

  • Having secured bail for our client, the Kangs team thoroughly reviewed the evidence that had been served by the Prosecution and took detailed instructions from him.
  • Suitable highly experienced Queen’s Counsel, Michael Duck QC, was identified and instructed.  
  • During the course of meetings with our client he was advised in detail upon his position and the options available to him. 
  • Following a conference with Queen’s Counsel our client confirmed his intention not to defend the charges.
  • Detailed discussions with the Prosecution resulted in an agreement that our client would plead guilty ‘on a Basis’ to robbery with a not guilty plea being accepted in relation to possession of an offensive weapon.
  • The Kangs team worked with our client in preparing his detailed mitigation to present to the court.

The Sentencing Hearing | Kangs Criminal Defence Specialists

  • Although the Prosecution placed the accepted offence in the category B/2, which attracts a prison sentence starting at four years, within a range of three to six years, Queen’s Counsel on behalf of our client submitted strong mitigation including his age and previous lack of any convictions.
  • Following his consideration of the detailed mitigation that had been prepared and submitted to the Judge he sentenced our client to two years custody which was suspended for a period of two years, together with an Order for unpaid work and payment of compensation.
  • Our client and his family were delighted with the outcome.

How Can We Help You? | Kangs Crime & Fraud Defence Solicitors

Defending prosecutions in respect of any alleged criminal offence requires extensive experienced consideration of all matters including the evidence relied upon by the Prosecution. 

The experienced team at Kangs Solicitors offers years of experience to ensure that all steps are taken to critically analyse and evaluate each client’s personal requirements in order to achieve the most favourable result available.

We Are Here To Help | Contact Us | Kangs Criminal Defence Solicitors

If you require any advice or assistance in respect of any criminal matter please do not hesitate to contact our team through the following:

Hamraj Kang
hkang@kangssolicitors.co.uk
07976 258171 | 020 7936 6396 | 0121 449 9888

Helen Holder
hholder@kanngssolicitors.co.uk
0121 449 9888 | 020 7936 6396

Amandeep Murria
amurria@kangssolicitors.co.uk
0121 449 9888 | 020 7936 6396

Suki Randhawa
srandhawa@kangssolicitors.co.uk
0121 449 9888 | 020 7936 6396 | 07989 521210 (24hr Emergency Number)

News insights, Serious Fraud, Services
A former Labour MP, Jared O’Mara, has received an immediate custodial sentence of four years having been found guilty, following his trial, of six counts of fraud relating to false expenses claims for work that he never carried out in respect of jobs that did not even exist. For further Press details please follow the […]
07/03/23
Criminal Litigation, News insights, Services
Kangs Solicitors has recently successfully defended a client facing an allegation of assault occasioning actual bodily harm arising from an incident forced upon him whilst he was simply conducting his  business, running a restaurant in London’s West End, when confronted with an unsavoury situation. Kangs Solicitors was instructed from the onset attending the interview under caution at Charing […]
06/03/23
Insolvency, News insights, Services
Kangs Solicitors has been instructed to defend claims against our client alleging breaches of Section 212 and 213 of the Insolvency Act 1986. The claims are being brought by the joint liquidators of our client’s company on the basis that our client allegedly knew that he and his company were participating in ‘Missing Trader Intra- Community’ Fraud’ […]
01/03/23

Get in touch