22/11/19

Property Management Company Fined | Kangs Health and Safety Regulatory Solicitors

Share

Aylesbury Crown Court has imposed a substantial fine upon a company (‘the company’) as the result of a number of its employees having suffered Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome (‘HAVS’).      

Amandeep Murria of Kangs Solicitors sets out the circumstances.

The Circumstances | Kangs Solicitors Health and Safety Team

  • Between 2009 and 2014, a number of the company’s employees used vibrating powered tools at various maintenance sites
  • The powered tools were being used to carry out various types of ground maintenance
  • As a result of the use of these tools, employees developed HAVS

The Health & Safety Executive conducted a thorough investigation and concluded that the company had failed: 

1. To replace the powered tools, which increased the levels of vibration

2. To undertake any health risk assessments regarding the use of the equipment

3. To implement adequate training on how the equipment should be used

The Relevant Law | Kangs Regulatory Law Advisors

The Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 (‘the Act’) provides:

‘2  General duties of employers to their employees.

(1) It shall be the duty of every employer to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees.

(2) Without prejudice to the generality of an employer’s duty under the preceding subsection, the matters to which that duty extends include in particular

(a) the provision and maintenance of plant and systems of work that are, so far as is reasonably practicable, safe and without risks to health;

(b) arrangements for ensuring, so far as is reasonably practicable, safety and absence of risks to health in connection with the use, handling, storage and transport of articles and substances;

(c) the provision of such information, instruction, training and supervision as is necessary to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health and safety at work of his employees;

(d) so far as is reasonably practicable as regards any place of work under the employer’s control, the maintenance of it in a condition that is safe and without risks to health and the provision and maintenance of means of access to and egress from it that are safe and without such risks;

(e) the provision and maintenance of a working environment for his employees that is, so far as is reasonably practicable, safe, without risks to health, and adequate as regards facilities and arrangements for their welfare at work.’

The Hearing | Kangs Health and Safety Solicitors

The company pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 2 (1) of the Act and was:

  • Fined £600,000   
  • Ordered to pay Prosecution Costs of £13,995.06         

An Inspector from the Health & Safety Executive, Andrew McGill, was quoted as saying:

“Companies must manage the risks associated with vibrating tools. Hand arm vibration can be a significant health risk wherever powered hand tools are used for significant lengths of time.

“HAVS is preventable, but once the damage is done it is permanent. Damage from HAVS can include the inability to do fine work and cold can trigger painful finger blanching attacks. Health surveillance is vital to detect and respond to early signs of damage.”

How Can We Help? | Kangs Safety At Work Solicitors

Kangs Solicitors has a wealth of knowledge and experience in dealing with all matters of health and safety law.

Our specialist solicitors are able to provide advice and assistance throughout the entire criminal process, from the initial intervention by the Health and Safety Executive through to enforcement, interview under caution and ultimately the defence of any ensuing criminal prosecution.

Who Can I Contact For Help? | Kangs National Criminal Defence Solicitors

If we can be of assistance, our Team is available via telephone 0333 370 4333 and by email info@kangssolicitors.co.uk.

We provide initial no obligation discussion at our three offices in London, Birmingham and Manchester.

Alternatively, discussions can be held virtually through live conferencing or telephone.

Hamraj Kangs 0340 BW scaled e1690223799706

Hamraj Kang

Email Hamraj

07976 258171

020 7936 6396

0121 449 9888

Amandeep Murria

Amandeep Murria

Email Amandeep

0121 449 9888

020 7936 6396

0161 817 5020

John Veale 1

John Veale

Email John

0121 449 9888

020 7936 6396

0161 817 5020

Regulatory
Traffic Commissioners are independent regulators responsible for regulating and licensing operators of heavy goods vehicles (HGVs), public service vehicles (PSVs) and bus services. They ensure that these operators and their drivers comply with the required safety and operating standards. When any issue of concern arises, for example where there maybe breaches of compliance, a Traffic […]
03/07/24
FCA Investigations, Regulatory
The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (‘the Act’) provides for the regulation of competition in digital markets. Under this Act, companies and individuals may be investigated by the Competition and Markets Authority (‘the CMA’) for various reasons. These include amongst other things, monopolistic behaviours such as price-fixing or colluding to hinder competition, as […]
01/07/24
Criminal Litigation, Regulatory
Firearms control in the UK is amongst the most stringent in the world with the result that offences involving firearms represent a small proportion of all criminal offences. The purchase, acquisition or possession of a firearm and ammunition, is managed by the issue of a certificate to an individual who has an acceptable reason to […]
20/06/24

Get in touch

Need legal assistance? Contact our experienced team for prompt and professional support.
Old map of Birmingham