Ecstatic Client | Confiscation Proceedings Abandoned | Kangs POCA Specialists


Kangs Solicitors has successfully defended a client against an attempt by the Crown Prosecution Service under section 22 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (‘POCA’) to confiscate further assets despite the conclusion of the original Confiscation Proceedings against him.

Frances Murray of Kangs Solicitors outlines the circumstances.

The Circumstances | Kangs POCA Defence Solicitors

Section 22 of POCA enables the Prosecution to re-open confiscation proceedings where:

  1. a Confiscation Order has been made but there were insufficient assets to satisfy it
  2. suitable additional realisable assets are alleged to have become available to discharge the outstanding debt
  3. the Court considers it just to vary the amount payable under the original Confiscation Order.
  • Our client realised a property towards settling his Confiscation Order, resulting in an outstanding amount due of fifteen thousand pounds.
  • The Prosecution made an application under section 22 to recover the balance, alleging further assets were available for realisation.

How We Assisted Our Client | Kangs National POCA Defence Team

  • We attended our client discussing at length the steps he had already taken to discharge his indebtedness in order to fulfil his obligations under his Confiscation Order.
  • Additionally, we considered with him his financial position, the prospects of realising any other assets and the implications upon him of trying to do so.
  • A comprehensive response to the Prosecution’s application was prepared setting out in detail the reasons why it was wholly disproportionate and unjust for the application to be allowed to proceed and that the application amounted to an abuse of process and represented both a waste of the court’s time and a drain on the public purse.
  • Having considered the representations made by Kangs Solicitors, the Prosecution accepted that it would be inappropriate to proceed and abandoned the
  • Our client was ecstatic and, understandably, very relieved at the outcome.

The client commented on Frances Murray as follows:

“Many thanks for representing me through my case with all the best advice I truly appreciate.”

How Can We Help? | Kangs POCA Defence Solicitors

POCA proceedings are extremely complex matters, the defence of which requires patience, attention to detail, considerable analytical skills and a great deal of experience.

Our team is highly recognized for its work defending confiscation issues of the most complicted nature.

Who Can I Contact For Help? | Kangs Financial Crime Defence Solicitors

If you are involved in confiscation proceedings of any nature we are available to assist and advise you.

Our team of Solicitors has a proven track record of assisting many individuals achieve the best possible result with all manner of financial investigations and can be contacted through any one of the following:

Hamraj Kang
07976 258171 | 020 7936 6396 | 0121 449 9888

John Veale
0121 449 9888 | 020 7936 6396

Tim Thompson
020 7936 6396 | 0121 449 9888

News insights, Serious Fraud, Services
A former Labour MP, Jared O’Mara, has received an immediate custodial sentence of four years having been found guilty, following his trial, of six counts of fraud relating to false expenses claims for work that he never carried out in respect of jobs that did not even exist. For further Press details please follow the […]
Criminal Litigation, News insights, Services
Kangs Solicitors has recently successfully defended a client facing an allegation of assault occasioning actual bodily harm arising from an incident forced upon him whilst he was simply conducting his  business, running a restaurant in London’s West End, when confronted with an unsavoury situation. Kangs Solicitors was instructed from the onset attending the interview under caution at Charing […]
Insolvency, News insights, Services
Kangs Solicitors has been instructed to defend claims against our client alleging breaches of Section 212 and 213 of the Insolvency Act 1986. The claims are being brought by the joint liquidators of our client’s company on the basis that our client allegedly knew that he and his company were participating in ‘Missing Trader Intra- Community’ Fraud’ […]

Get in touch