Pleading Guilty Without Advice | Kangs Criminal Defence Solicitors


The reduced availability of public funding, via legal aid, to assist those charged with a criminal offence to obtain legal representation, is resulting in more people endeavouring to defend themselves.

As a result, guilty pleas are frequently being entered without any understanding of the potential consequences.

John Veale of Kangs Solicitors comments generally upon the dilemma being faced by those facing such a situation.

The Usual Reasons For Pleading | Kangs Criminal Defence Advisory Team

Proper consideration of the Prosecution evidence can only be undertaken by an experienced criminal defence lawyer acting on behalf of the accused person.

It should be remembered that anyone associated with the Prosecution will have an entirely different agenda and a very limited obligation to render any advice to an accused with a view to protecting that person’s best interests.

This situation frequently results in an inappropriate guilty plea being entered because:

  • the accused may have been encouraged to believe that their situation is hopeless, that the case against them is ‘cut and dried’ when an experienced defence lawyer may well identify weakness/failings in the evidence produced,
  • an early plea may have been encouraged upon the inducement of a reduced sentence but which totally ignores other opportunities that may be available, the accused may, at that point, through shock and confusion find that they cannot face the prospect of defending their position at a trial.
  • the accused may believe that their matter will be dealt with quickly without considering the potential lifelong consequences which may follow,
  • the accused may harbour the mistaken belief that it may be a simple formality to reverse their plea at a future date.

Reversing a Guilty Plea | Kangs Crime Procedure Solicitors

It has been recognised by the Court of Appeal that very few accused who enter a plea in the absence of receipt of any legal advice will have any legal knowledge.

Accordingly, the scope for an Application to the court seeking to set aside a guilty plea may be wider than generally appreciated.

The general principle is that the Court will only set aside a guilty plea if it can be shown that it is equivocal as set out in the case of P. Foster (Haulage) Ltd v Roberts [1978] 2 All ER 751.

Examples are:  

  • where a defendant pleaded guilty to handling but did not know the item in question was stolen.
  • the mistaken belief by the defendant that a guilty plea would secure bail.
  • the defendant was not advised of a legal defence that was available.

How Can We Help? | Kangs Criminal Defence Solicitors

It is essential that anyone accused of a criminal offence at any level and facing interview by any authority should seek advice from the onset, whether or not the availability of ongoing funding through the legal aid system is known at that stage.

Support throughout the interview process may be absolutely crucial and the team at Kangs Solicitors attends interviews of every nature throughout the country on a daily basis.

If we can be of assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our team through any of the following:

Sukhdip Randhawa
0121 449 9888 | 020 7936 6396 | 07989 521 210

Amandeep Murria
0121 449 9888 | 07989 521 210

News insights, Serious Fraud, Services
A former Labour MP, Jared O’Mara, has received an immediate custodial sentence of four years having been found guilty, following his trial, of six counts of fraud relating to false expenses claims for work that he never carried out in respect of jobs that did not even exist. For further Press details please follow the […]
Criminal Litigation, News insights, Services
Kangs Solicitors has recently successfully defended a client facing an allegation of assault occasioning actual bodily harm arising from an incident forced upon him whilst he was simply conducting his  business, running a restaurant in London’s West End, when confronted with an unsavoury situation. Kangs Solicitors was instructed from the onset attending the interview under caution at Charing […]
Insolvency, News insights, Services
Kangs Solicitors has been instructed to defend claims against our client alleging breaches of Section 212 and 213 of the Insolvency Act 1986. The claims are being brought by the joint liquidators of our client’s company on the basis that our client allegedly knew that he and his company were participating in ‘Missing Trader Intra- Community’ Fraud’ […]

Get in touch