10/09/19

Sentencing Variations | Kangs Criminal Defence Solicitors

Share

It occasionally appears confusing that individuals convicted, frequently in different courts, of a similar offence, seemingly, receive substantially different sentences.

Nazaqat Maqsoom of Kangs Solicitors provides an insight into why sentences for similar convictions may vary.   

Sentencing Considerations | Kangs Criminal Law Procedure Advisory Solicitors

When passing sentence, Judges are obliged to consider a number of factors amongst which are those which may either be regarded as aggravating the commission of the offence or those which mitigate the liability of the defendant. 

Whilst two cases may, prima facie, appear very similar, examination of the facts surrounding each case may, in reality show that they are entirely different. 

Although the facts of two cases may appear similar, a convicted person with a record of offending is likely to receive a tougher sentence than someone who was, prior to commission of the offence in question, of good character.

A defendant who pleads guilty to an offence is likely to receive a lesser sentence than a person who pleads not guilty but is found guilty by a jury following trial.

The extent of a sentence may also be affected by the role of the defendant in the commission of the criminal activity, age and other personal mitigation.

Sentencing Safeguards | Criminal Sentencing Appeal Solicitors

Any sentence that appears manifestly excessive or wrong in principle, can be appealed by the defendant.

The Attorney General can refer any sentence regarded as unduly lenient to the Court of Appeal.    

The Court of Appeal will not entertain an appeal simply because a sentence passed to another defendant in a different court in respect of a similar matter was lower.

Where defendants are sentenced in the same case, any disparity in sentencing is a fundamental consideration. Cases involving multiple defendants are slightly more complex and issues that arise with regards to disparity in sentencing require proper assessment.

Sentencing guidelines are in place to ensure that Judges exercise their discretion carefully and properly.  

How We Can Assist | Kangs National Criminal Defence Solicitors

In respect of all alleged criminal allegations at every level it is essential that experienced legal help and guidance is sought from the outset to ensure that your position is protected as far as is possible in the circumstance that each allegation presents.

At Kangs Solicitors we are experienced in dealing with all stages of the criminal process and obtaining the best available outcome for our clients.

If we can be of assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our team through any of the following:

Hamraj Kang
hkang@kangssolicitors.co.uk
07976 258171 | 020 7936 6396 | 0121 449 9888

John Veale
jveale@kangssolicitors.co.uk
0121 449 9888 | 020 7936 6396

Sukhdip Randhawa
srandhawa@kangssolicitors.co.uk
0121 449 9888 | 020 7936 6396 | 07989 521 210 (24hr Emergency Number)

Helen Holder
hholder@kangssolicitors.co.uk
0121 449 9888 | 020 7936 6396

News insights, Serious Fraud, Services
A former Labour MP, Jared O’Mara, has received an immediate custodial sentence of four years having been found guilty, following his trial, of six counts of fraud relating to false expenses claims for work that he never carried out in respect of jobs that did not even exist. For further Press details please follow the […]
07/03/23
Criminal Litigation, News insights, Services
Kangs Solicitors has recently successfully defended a client facing an allegation of assault occasioning actual bodily harm arising from an incident forced upon him whilst he was simply conducting his  business, running a restaurant in London’s West End, when confronted with an unsavoury situation. Kangs Solicitors was instructed from the onset attending the interview under caution at Charing […]
06/03/23
Insolvency, News insights, Services
Kangs Solicitors has been instructed to defend claims against our client alleging breaches of Section 212 and 213 of the Insolvency Act 1986. The claims are being brought by the joint liquidators of our client’s company on the basis that our client allegedly knew that he and his company were participating in ‘Missing Trader Intra- Community’ Fraud’ […]
01/03/23

Get in touch

Need legal assistance? Contact our experienced team for prompt and professional support.