The Appeals System | Kangs Criminal Defence Solicitors


As part of the Judicial System, and in the pursuit of justice, the Appeals procedure provides the process whereby an individual who claims that a judicial process has produced an incorrect outcome may be able to challenge the same.

Often the basis of an appeal is normally that one or more procedural errors had occurred or that there was an incorrect interpretation of the law by the Judge in charge of the trial.

John Veale of Kangs Solicitors briefly outlines the process in respect of appeals in the criminal courts.

Classification of Appeals | Kangs Criminal Appeal Advisory Solicitors

Against Conviction:        

Such an appeal:

  • should be lodged within twenty eight days of conviction,
  • should be supported by an Advice and the Grounds of Appeal prepared by the trial defence barrister. Those grounds will set out the reasons why it is alleged that the conviction is considered to be un-safe,
  • must be lodged at the Court of Appeal,
  • will be reviewed by a Single judge
  • if assessed by the single Judge to have merit, will be heard by a court comprising three judges.
  • may result in the conviction being quashed and the case being sent back to the Crown Court for a retrial or the appeal being dismissed.

Against Sentence:                    

Such an appeal:

  • will follow the same time constraints and process as explained above,
  • will, in the Advice and Grounds of Appeal, set out why it is considered that the sentence handed down was incorrect.

Important Practical Considerations | Kangs Criminal Appeals Team

  • an appeal against sentence can be submitted without the support of an Advice and Grounds of Appeal prepared by a barrister. However, if the Court of Appeal considers that the reasons for the appeal are not well founded, it can order that a proportion of time already served in prison will not count against the length of the sentence being served.
  • sentences can be increased by the Court of Appeal.
  • sentences can be appealed by the Prosecution if it is considered that the sentence passed by the Crown Court is unduly lenient.
  • the Sentencing Guidelines, which will have been considered, if properly followed, render a successful appeal against sentence very difficult to accomplish.

Appeals Out of Time | Kangs Criminal Appeals Solicitors

It is possible for an appeal to be submitted out of time where, for example, fresh evidence comes to light that was not available to the defence team at the trial.

In such a circumstance a case may be referred to the Criminal Cases Review Commission which may investigate an alleged miscarriage of justice.

 How Can We Help? | Kangs National Criminal Defence Solicitors

The team at Kangs Solicitors has a wealth of knowledge and experience in dealing with the appeals system at all levels.

It is essential that experienced advice and support is obtained at the earliest possible date and our team is available to assist you.

Please do not hesitate to contact our team through any of the following:

John Veale
0121 449 9888 | 020 7936 6396

Helen Holder
020 7936 6396 | 0121 449 9888

Aman Murria
0121 449 9888 | 020 7936 6396

News insights, Serious Fraud, Services
A former Labour MP, Jared O’Mara, has received an immediate custodial sentence of four years having been found guilty, following his trial, of six counts of fraud relating to false expenses claims for work that he never carried out in respect of jobs that did not even exist. For further Press details please follow the […]
Criminal Litigation, News insights, Services
Kangs Solicitors has recently successfully defended a client facing an allegation of assault occasioning actual bodily harm arising from an incident forced upon him whilst he was simply conducting his  business, running a restaurant in London’s West End, when confronted with an unsavoury situation. Kangs Solicitors was instructed from the onset attending the interview under caution at Charing […]
Insolvency, News insights, Services
Kangs Solicitors has been instructed to defend claims against our client alleging breaches of Section 212 and 213 of the Insolvency Act 1986. The claims are being brought by the joint liquidators of our client’s company on the basis that our client allegedly knew that he and his company were participating in ‘Missing Trader Intra- Community’ Fraud’ […]

Get in touch