Solicitors and Lawyers | The Difference | Kangs Criminal Defence Solicitors


Clients frequently ask us to explain the difference between a ‘solicitor’ and a ‘lawyer’.

John Veale of Kangs Solicitors outlines the importance of ensuring that the correct choice is made when seeking legal guidance.

Identification | Kangs National Team Of Solicitors

The word ‘lawyer’ is a generic  term encompassing many descriptions of those practising the law, legally or otherwise, including such terms frequently heard during TV programmes as brief, legal advisor or, the predominantly American, attorney.

‘Lawyer’ as a generic  term includes ‘solicitor’ but ‘solicitor’ is a specific  description only attaching to those who meet the strict requirements necessary to receive an annual Practising Certificate issued under strict control by the The Law Society, which is a Solicitor’s Practising Certificate and never a ‘Lawyer’s Practising Certificate’.

Such Solicitor’s Practising Certificate evidences that:

  • a solicitor is a highly qualified legal professional
  • who is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and  
  • who is admitted on to the Roll to practice as a solicitor by the Law Society and
  • from whom adherence to highest ethical standards can be expected as laid down in a strict Code of Conduct.

The title of ‘solicitor’ is protected by the Solicitor’s Act 1974 in which Section 21 states:

‘Any unqualified person who wilfully pretends to be, or takes or uses any name, title, addition or description implying that he is, qualified or recognised by law as qualified to act as a solicitor shall be guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding the fourth level on the standard scale.’

and Section 20 states:

‘No unqualified person is to act as a solicitor.’

An offence under section 20 carries up to two years imprisonment and custodial sentences are usual, underlying the seriousness of attempting to pose as a solicitor.

Insurance Indemnity | Kangs National Crime Team

Crucially, in order to be able to practice, a solicitor will be required to have indemnity insurance in place to the satisfaction of The Law Society which will:

  • cover all the areas of the solicitor’s practice.
  • provide full protection.
  • cover all work conducted by the solicitor’s firm.

How Can We Assist? | Kangs National Criminal Defence Solicitors

Kangs Solicitors has a national reputation for defending clients facing criminal prosecutions of all types including the most complex fraud offences.

Our team is led by Hamraj Kang who is recognised as a leading expert in the field. He is one of only two solicitors nationally to be ranked as a ‘star individual’ for five consecutive years in the legal directory Chambers & Partners.

Other members of the team are ranked in the Legal 500 and also ranked in Chambers & Partners.

If you are in need of our expert help and advice please do not hesitate to contact our team through any of the following.

Hamraj Kang
07976 258171 | 020 7936 6396 | 0121 449 9888

John Veale
0121 449 9888 | 07989 521 210

Helen Holder
0121 449 9888 | 020 7936 6396 | 0161 817 5020

Tim Thompson
020 7936 6396 | 0121 449 9888

News insights, Serious Fraud, Services
A former Labour MP, Jared O’Mara, has received an immediate custodial sentence of four years having been found guilty, following his trial, of six counts of fraud relating to false expenses claims for work that he never carried out in respect of jobs that did not even exist. For further Press details please follow the […]
Criminal Litigation, News insights, Services
Kangs Solicitors has recently successfully defended a client facing an allegation of assault occasioning actual bodily harm arising from an incident forced upon him whilst he was simply conducting his  business, running a restaurant in London’s West End, when confronted with an unsavoury situation. Kangs Solicitors was instructed from the onset attending the interview under caution at Charing […]
Insolvency, News insights, Services
Kangs Solicitors has been instructed to defend claims against our client alleging breaches of Section 212 and 213 of the Insolvency Act 1986. The claims are being brought by the joint liquidators of our client’s company on the basis that our client allegedly knew that he and his company were participating in ‘Missing Trader Intra- Community’ Fraud’ […]

Get in touch