Kangs Solicitor
BIRMINGHAM: 0121 449 9888
LONDON: 020 7936 6396
MANCHESTER: 0161 817 5020

Winner of the Legal 500 – ‘Criminal, Fraud & Licensing Law Firm of the Year’ – “One of, if not the best, criminal specialist firms in the country”

Indecent Images

Legal 500

“This is a first class firm with unrivalled experience, a great track record, an acute attention to detail and a tenacity that clients really rate are all features of this firm”

Section 160 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 and section 1 of the Protection of Children Act 1978 criminalises being in possession of and distributing indecent images of children.

Section 160 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 states that:

It is an offence for a person to have any indecent photograph (or pseudo-photograph) of a child in his possession.

Section 1 of the Protection of Children Act 1978 states that:

“It is an offence for a person to

  1. take, or permit to be taken, or to make, an indecent photograph or pseudo-photograph of a child;
  2. distribute or show indecent photographs/pseudo-photographs;
  3. have in their possession indecent images/pseudo-images with a view that they be distributed or shown by himself or others; or
  4. publish an advertisement likely to be construed by other offenders as being one which shows that the advertiser intends to distribute the indecent images or that he intends to do so.”

The Offence In Detail

Both offences, as outlined above, have three common elements:

  1. indecent
  2. photographs or pseudo-photographs
  3. a child.

Whether a photograph (or pseudo-photograph) is indecent is an issue for the Magistrates or jury to decide in accordance with recognised standards of propriety.

An indecent photograph includes an indecent film, a copy of an indecent photograph or film, a negative version and electronically stored data which is capable of conversion into a photograph. A pseudo-photograph means an image whether made by computer graphics or any other way, which appears to be a photograph.

A child is a person under the age of 18. The age of a child in an image is to be determined by the Magistrates or the jury.

 

The section 1 offence prohibits four types of conduct as follows:

  1. take or permit to be taken or make any such photograph – this covers the downloading of an image, the opening of an attachment, storing an image on a computer, accessing a website in which images appear by way of automatic pop up. The act must be a deliberate and intentional one, done with the knowledge that the image made is, or is likely to be, an indecent photograph of a child.
  2. distribute or show any such photograph – a person is guilty of this offence if it is proven that he parts with possession of the image or exposes or offers it for acquisition by another person.
  3. have in their possession indecent images/pseudo-images with a view that they be distributed or shown by himself or others – in order to be guilty of this part of the legislation a defendant must knowingly have custody and control of the photographs with the intention to distribute / show them to others.
  4. publish an advertisement likely to be construed by other offenders as being one which shows that the advertiser intends to distribute the indecent images or that he intends to do so – a defendant is guilty if they publish an advertisement intentionally and knowingly.

The s.160 offence is committed by possession of an indecent image, even if it has been created through computer graphics or any other means, if it has the appearance of a photograph.

Possession involves both a physical and mental element. The defendant must have knowingly had custody and control of the photographs in order to possess them. This is particularly important in relation to deleted images. It is important to consider where the images are stored, the means by which they could be retrieved and whether the defendant has the ability to retrieve them.

What Defences Are Available?

The following defences may be available:

  1. the person had a legitimate reason for having the image in his possession;
  2. the person had not seen the photograph and did not know/suspect the image to be indecent; or
  3. the photograph was received by him, without prior request, and it was not kept in his possession for an unreasonable time.
  4. The person making the image proves that it was necessary to do so for the purposes of the prevention, detection or investigation of crime, or for the purposes of criminal proceedings.

The Court Procedure

Offences under Section 1 of the Protection of Children Act 1978 are ‘either way’ offences which means they can be dealt with in either a Magistrates’ Court or a Crown Court. A person convicted of the section 1 offence faces a maximum sentence of ten years imprisonment. The offence in Section 160 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 is also triable ‘either way’ and carries a maximum penalty on indictment of five years imprisonment. In 2014 the Sentencing Guidelines Council issued revised guidelines categorising the indecent images of children by level of seriousness as follows: Category A – Images involving penetrative sexual activity, sexual activity with an animal or sadism. Category B – Images involving non-penetrative sexual activity. Category C – Indecent images not falling within categories A or B.

Who Can I Contact For Advice & Help?

It is imperative that you instruct an experienced solicitor as soon as you are made aware of an allegation being made. Crucially, it is always important to have a solicitor present in interview at the police station whether it is an interview by appointment or under arrest.

Legal 500

“Kangs Solicitors is rated for the ‘proactive, expert defence’ it provides to executives and high-net-worth individuals”

Legal 500

“One of, if not the best, criminal specialist firms in the country”

Chambers UK

“Its is a first rate firm that is dedicated to its clients and is tenacious in challenging the prosecution”

Legal 500

“It has very bright individuals at all levels who know the system inside out”

Legal 500

“Kangs Solicitors is a standout firm whose lawyers are hardworking, highly knowledgeable and great with clients”

Chambers UK

“They are really great lawyers. Their client care is premium”

Chambers UK

“Kangs is a very proactive firm. They are always very quick off the mark in cases, which provides clients with great reassurance. They are always available to meet with clients at short notice, which is invaluable as often the advice sought is urgent”

Latest News

HMRC Civil Tax Investigations VAT Assessments Tax Tribunals
Serious Fraud, VAT & Tax Tax Investigations & COP 9  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
Sports Law & Management    
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
Hamraj Kang

Hamraj Kang

Stuart Southall

Stuart Southall

Mick Carney

Mick Carney

Colin Parker

Colin Parker

Amandeep Murria

Amandeep Murria

Zahir Ahmed

Zahir Ahmed

John Veale

John Veale

Helen Holder

Helen Holder

Sukhdip Randhawa

Sukhdip Randhawa

Tim Thompson

Tim Thompson